Monday 28 January 2013

Sultan Mahmood Ghaznavi



سلطان محمود غزنوی کے تین شکوک اور ان کے جوابات .... سلطان محمود غزنوی مشہور مسلمان بادشاہ گزرے ہیں ،وہ موجودہ دور کے
 مسلمان حکمرانوں جیسے مسلمان نہیں تھے بلکہ دین کو سمجھنے والے اور اسلامی تعلیمات پر عمل کرنے والے بادشاہ تھے۔انہوں نے 997 سے 1030ء تک افغانستان پر حکومت کی ۔ ایک بار ان کے دل میں تین شکوک پیدا ہوگئے اوران کی شدید خواہش تھی کہ انہیں ان شکوک کے جواب مل جائیں اور ذہن ان شکوک سے پاک ہوجائے۔

پہلا شک اس حدیث کے متعلق تھا جس کا مفہوم ہے کہ "علماء انبیاء کے وارث ہیں "سلطان کو اس حدیث پر یہ شک تھا کہ یہ علم دین حاصل کرنے والے طلاب اور علماء تو انبیاء کے وارث ہیں مگر میں ایک مسلمان بادشاہ ہوں اور اللہ کے راستے میں خیرات کرتا ہوں اور نیکی کے کاموں میں بڑھ چڑھ کر حصہ لیتا ہوں تو میں کیوں نبیوں کا وراث نہیں ہوسکتا۔ اسے شک ہوا کہ ہوسکتا ہے کہ یہ حدیث کسی نے اپنے پاس سے بنائی ہو اور حقیقت میں ایسا نہ ہو۔

دوسرا شک یہ تها کہ لوگوں نے اسے کہا کہ تو سبگتگین کا بیٹا نہیں ہے بلکہ اس نے تجھے غلام کے طور پر خریدا اور تجھے محبت اور پیار سے رکھا اس لئے اپنا بیٹا بنایا حالانکہ حقیقت میں تو اس کا بیٹا نہیں ،بلکہ تیرے باپ کا کوئی پتہ نہیں کون تھا۔سلطان کو بہت تشویش ہوئی کہ وہ خود کو سبگتگین کا بیٹا سمجھتا رہا مگر لوگوں کے مطابق اس کے باپ کا کسی کو پتہ ہی نہیں اور وہ سبگتگین کا بیٹا نہیں بلکہ غلام ہے۔

تیسرا شک یہ تھا کہ اگرچہ اس نے بہت سے نیک کام کیے اور رعایا کو خوش رکھا ظلم اور ناانصافی سے دور رہا ،اس سب کو با وجود اس کی بخشش ہوگی یا نہیں ۔چونکہ سلطان محمود غزنوی ایک سچا مسلمان تھا لہذا اس کے دل میں خواہش تھی کہ اسے دنیا میں ہی پتہ چل جائے کہ اس کی بخشش ہو گی یا نہیں ۔

چنانچہ ایک رات وہ اپنے مشیروں اور مشعل برداروں کے ساتھ رات سیرو سیاحت میں محو تھا کہ اچانک اس کی نظر کچھ دورایک کباب کی دوکان پر کھڑے ایک طالب علم پر پڑی جو بھٹی کی روشنی میں کتاب پڑھنے میں مصروف تھا اور کوئی دینی مدرسہ کا طالب علم معلوم ہوتا تھا ،سلطان نے دیکھا کہ کبابی اسے با ر بار بھگا دیتا مگر وہ لڑکا کچھ دیر بعد پھر آجاتا اور مطالعہ میں مصروف ہوجاتا۔سلطان اس طالب علم کی محنت او ر لگن سے متاثر ہوااور اپنے ایک مشعل بردار سے کہا کہ جاؤ اور اس طالب علم کی مشکل اپنی مشعل کی روشنی سےآسان کردو چنانچہ مشعل بردار اس طالب علم کے پاس چلا گیا۔

سلطان اس و اقعہ سے فارغ ہوکر جب محو استراحت ہو ا تو اسے خواب میں اللہ کے محبوب صلی اللہ علیہ وسلم کی زیارت ہوئی اور اللہ کے پیارے پیغمبر صلی اللہ علیہ وسلم نے فرمایاجس کا مفہوم ہے :

"اے سبگتگین کے بیٹےتو نے انبیاء کے ایک وارث کی مدد کی اور اس کی مشکل کو آسان کیا اس کے صلے میں اللہ نے تیری بخشش فرمائی۔"

سلطان کو اپنے تینوں شکوک کا جواب ایک ایسی شخصیت سے مل چکا تھا جن کی کسی بھی بات پر شک و شبہ کی گنجائش ہی نہیں ہو سکتی۔

1 حدیث کے متعلق کہ علماء انبیاء کے وارث ہیں
2 اس کا باپ سبگتگین ہی تھا کیونکہ اللہ کے پیغمبر صلی اللہ علیہ وسلم نے اسے اس کے باپ کے نام سے پکارا۔
3 انبیاء کے وارث کی مدد کرنے پر بخشش کی بشارت دے دی گئی

یہ تھے دور ماضی کے مسلما ن بادشاہ جن کے شکوک کے جواب بھی حضور نے خود ان کی خواب میں آکر دیے۔ اللہ ہمیں بھی ایسے ہی سچے اور پکے مسلمان حکمران نصیب فرمائے ... آمین ثُم آمین یا رب العالمین 

A love letter from a Muslim man to the girl he loves.


                          A love letter from a Muslim man to the girl he loves.



“If you love me, don’t confess your love to me, this won’t please me and will keep me away! love words don’t attract me. If you love me, wait for me and I will knock on your door in the right time. Don’t give me privileges which I don’t deserve. Keep me away from you, and I will approach you. If you approach me, I will stay away from you. Don’t love me, for I want you ignorant in love. I want to teach you love when the right time come and you will be my Halal, only when we are joined together under our Creator’s satisfaction.

Don’t tell me what you feel, don’t give me from your time, don’t push me to lose you. I am a man who won’t accept to see the one he loves committing sins or to live a forbidden love behind the back of her family. I don’t want her to feel guilty and don’t want her heart to suffer.

Put limits to me that I won’t cross, kill me inside you so I won’t grow to kill you. Preserve what is beautiful inside you. I want you innocent, chaste, pure. I want you dear, not easy. And then, Only then, I will face everything and will be ready to go through difficulties to get you

How could I be a faithful man to you when I try to break your chastity? How would I be faithful to you if I push you to betray your family? How could I trust a love which grew under Allah’s wrath ? To love you means to protect you, to preserve you not to kill what is beautiful in you.

Don’t be easy because then, I may not value you. Don’t love me now, so I won’t hate you! My heart wants you and doesn’t want to lose you. I don’t want you to be just a passing fancy to me, I want you a wife, a lover, the mother of my children, I want you to be the one I will spend my whole life with.


Sunday 27 January 2013

The Story of Muhammad Yousf



’’ہماری رہائش ریلوے کالونی گڑھی شاہو لاہور میں تھی ۔یہاں میرے ہم مذہبوں کے بھی گھرتھے لیکن زیادہ آبادی مسلمانوں کی تھی۔ اتفاق کی بات کہیے کہ میرا زیادہ اٹھنا بیٹھنا ملنا جلنا اور کھیلنا کودنا بھی مسلمان لڑکوں کے ساتھ ہی تھا ۔سچی بات یہ ہے کہ وہ بھی مجھے اپنے جیسے ہی لگتے تھے ۔مسلمانوں کے ہاں مجھے کوئی ایسی خاص خوبی یا امتیازی بات نظر نہیں آتی تھی کہ میرے دل میں مسلمان ہونے کا شوق پیدا ہوتا ،مسلمان لڑکوں کے مشغلے بھی میرے جیسے ہی تھے۔ ایف سی کالج میں پڑھائی کے دوران میری دوستی ایک ہم جماعت لڑکے جاوید انور سے قائم ہوئی وہ کرکٹ کے سپرسٹار اور ہمارے سینئر ساتھی سعید انور کا چھوٹا بھائی ہے۔ میں نے زندگی بھر اس جیسا لڑکا نہیں دیکھا ۔میں اسے ملنے سعید بھائی کے گھر جاتارہتا تھا ۔سعید بھائی تو 1989ء سے قومی ٹیم میں تھے ،میں کوئی نوسال بعد 1998ء میں ٹیم میں آیا ۔وہاں اکثر ایک سابق کرکٹر ذوالقرنین حیدر آجاتے تھے جو تبلیغی جماعت میں شامل ہوگئے تھے۔ وہ نیکی اور نماز روزے کی تلقین کیا کرتے تھے۔ لیکن اس وقت سعید بھائی کو ایسی باتوں کی لگن نہ تھی ۔اکثر جب ذوالقرنین حیدر یا تبلیغ والے دوسرے لوگ آتے تو سعید بھائی مجھے باہر بھیج دیتے کہ کہہ آئو کہ سعید گھر پر نہیں ہے۔ پھر میں نے دیکھا کہ آہستہ آہستہ ان کی طبیعت مذہب کی طرف آنے لگی ۔تبلیغی جماعت کے بزرگوں سے بھی ان کا میل جول بڑھ گیا۔ اپنی بیٹی کی وفات کے بعد وہ مکمل طورپر مذہبی رنگ میں رنگ گئے۔ اکثر تبلیغی دوروں پر رہنے لگے ۔وہ مجھے کہتے تھے ’’یوسف ہرروز سونے سے پہلے یہ دعا مانگا کرو۔‘‘ اے خدا!مجھے حق اور سچ کا راستہ دکھا… سعید بھائی نے مجھے ان دنوں کبھی یہ نہ کہا کہ مسلمان ہوجائو ہمیشہ اس دعا کی تلقین کرتے رہے۔ میں سعید بھائی کی نصیحت کے مطابق ہمیشہ سونے سے پہلے یہ دعا مانگتا رہا ۔میں نے سعید بھائی میں آنے والی تبدیلیوں کو بڑے غور سے دیکھا اور بہت متاثر ہوا ،

پھر ایک عجیب بات ہوئی ۔میرا ایک دوست ہے وقار احمد، بڑی پرانی دوستی ہے ہماری ، یہ تین سال پہلے کی بات ہے میں حسب معمول رات کو یہ دعا مانگ کر سوگیا کہ ’’اے خدا مجھے حق اور سچ کا راستہ دکھا‘‘ رات میں نے خواب میں اپنے دوست وقار کو دیکھا وہ خوشی خوشی میرے پاس آیا اور کہنے لگا’’سنا ہے تم مسلمان ہوگئے ہو‘‘ میں نے اسے کوئی جواب نہ دیا ۔آنکھ کھلنے پر میں یہ سوچتا رہا کہ کیا واقعی اللہ نے مجھے حق اور سچ کا راستہ دکھادیا ہے۔ وقار شیخوپورہ کا رہنے والا ہے۔ اتفاق دیکھئے کہ انہی دنوں پی آئی اے اور نیشنل بینک کے درمیان میچ کیلئے شیخوپورہ کرکٹ گرائونڈ تجویز ہوا۔ میں پی آئی اے کی طرف سے کھیل رہا تھا ۔شیخوپورہ پہنچا تو میرا وہی دوست وقار احمد مجھ سے ملنے آگیا۔ وہی خواب والی وضع قطع ، میں اس وقت حیران رہ گیا جب اس نے بالکل اسی انداز سے مجھ سے پوچھا ’’سنا ہے تم مسلمان ہوگئے ہو؟‘‘میں اس کا منہ دیکھنے لگا۔ یہی وہ لمحہ تھا جب مجھے یقین ہوگیا کہ اللہ نے مجھے اشارہ دے دیا ہے کہ حق کا راستہ کیا ہے ۔

شام کو میں شیخوپورہ سے لاہور آیا تو سیدھا کیولری گرائونڈ سعید بھائی کے پاس چلا گیا یہ اکتوبر 2002ء کا ذکر ہے ۔میں نے سعید بھائی سے کہا ’’میں مسلمان ہونا چاہتا ہوں‘‘ سعید بھائی نے مجھے گلے سے لگالیا مجھے کلمہ پڑھایا اور میری دنیا بدل گئی۔ اس دوران میں جب بھی رائے ونڈ جاتا اور حاجی عبدالوہاب صاحب سے پوچھتا کہ اب مجھے اسلام قبول کرلینے کا اعلان کردینا چاہئے تو وہ کہتے ’’نہیں ابھی نہیں‘ شاید انہیں میری شکل دیکھ کر اندازہ ہوتا تھا کہ ابھی میں اس لائق نہیں ہوا ۔میری مولوی فہیم صاحب اور طارق جمیل صاحب سے بھی ملاقاتیں ہوتی رہیں۔ انضمام بھائی کو پتہ چلا تو انہوں نے بڑی شفقت کی ۔ جون 2005ء میں کرکٹ ٹیم کچھ میچ کھیلنے سعودی عرب گئی ۔میچ تو نہ ہوئے البتہ ٹیم نے عمرہ کیا ۔اس سے کوئی ڈیڑھ دومہینہ پہلے میری بیوی بھی اسلام قبول کرچکی تھی میں نے اسے آزادی دی تھی کہ وہ سوچ سمجھ کر فیصلہ کرے۔ پوری ٹیم نے عمرہ کیا لیکن میں ان کے ساتھ شامل نہ ہوا کیونکہ ابھی تک میں نے مسلمان ہونے کا کھلا اعلان نہیں کیا تھا لیکن مجھے سخت بے تابی تھی کہ عمرے کی سعادت حاصل کروں ۔ میری بیوی بھی میرے ہمراہ تھی ۔ اب وہ تانیہ کی بجائے فاطمہ ہوچکی تھی۔رائے ونڈ سے مولوی فہیم صاحب نے مکہ میں موجود عالمگیر صاحب کے ذمہ لگایا اور وہ رات گئے ہم دونوں کو حرم شریف لے گئے ہم نے عمرہ ادا کیا ، یہ اللہ کا بہت بڑا کرم تھا۔ رات کے پچھلے پہر شروع ہونے والا عمرہ صبح پانچ بجے ختم ہوا۔ میں نے اسی وقت مولوی فہیم صاحب کو فون کیا انہوں نے حاجی عبدالوہاب صاحب سے ذکر کیا جنہوں نے مجھے قبول اسلام کا اعلان کرنے کی اجازت دے دی۔ پاکستان واپس آتے ہی میں نے اعلان کردیا ۔اسے اتفاق یا قدرت کا انعام کہیے کہ میں نے اپنے بیٹے اور بیٹی کے نام بھی مسلمانوں والے رکھے تھے۔ بیٹی کا نام انیقہ یوسف اور بیٹے کا نام دانیال یوسف ہے ۔میرے قبول اسلام پر والد صاحب نے برہمی کا اظہار نہیں کیا والدہ کچھ رنجیدہ ہوئیں لیکن اب سب کچھ معمول پر آرہا ہے میں اللہ سے دعا گورہتا ہوں کہ وہ میرے پورے خاندان کو حق اور سچ کا راستہ دکھادے۔ آمین۔ ‘‘

The Question of Raf-ul-Yadain (Salat/Namaz)


The Question of Raf-ul-Yadain - Raising Of Hands in Salat/Namaz.

In this article, we shall give forty-two (42) Sahih evidences for the issue of not raising the hands in the Hanafi Madhhab.

The Question of Raf-ul-Yadain
Introduction
In this article, we shall give forty-two (42) Sahih evidences for the issue of not raising the hands in the Hanafi Madhhab. This article is a reproduction of an excellent booklet written by Majlis ul-Ulama of South Africa
NARRATIONAL EVIDENCE
Although the Hanafi Madhhab has also rational evidence for its view regarding Rafa’ Yadain, this booklet discusses only the Naqli (narrational) evidence on which is based the Hanafi practice of abstention from Rafa’ Yadain. The primary basis of all acts of Ibaadat is narrational evidence, not rational proofs. Rational proof is simply adduced as additional substantiation to strengthen an argument.
AHAADITH OF SAYYIDINA RASULULLAH Sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi wa Sallam
Proof 1
Uthmaan Bin Abi Shaibah - Wakee’ - Sufyaan - Aasim (Ibn Kulaib) - Abdur Rahmaan Bin Aswad - Alqamah said: Abdullah Bin Mas’ood (radhiyallahu anhu) said:
‘Should I not perform with you the Salaat of Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wa Sallam)?”
Alqamah said: ‘Then he (Ibn Mas’ood) performed Salaat and he did not raise his hands except once.’ (Abu Dawood)
Proof 2
Hasan Bin Ali - Muaawiyah - Khaalid Bin Amr Bin Saeed - Abu Huzaifah. They said Sufyaan narrated to us with this same isnaad (as mentioned in No. I above). He said:
‘He (Ibn Mas’ood) raised his hands in the beginning once.” Some narrators said: 'one time’. (Abu Dawood)
Proof 3
Hannaad - Wakee’ - Sufyaan - Aasim bin Kulaib -Abdur Rahmaan bin Al Aswad - Alqamah who said: ‘Abdullah Bin Mas’ood (radhiyallahu anhu) said:
“Should I not perform with you the Salaat of Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wa Sallam)?’
He (Ibn Mas’ood) then performed Salaat and he did not raise his hands except in the beginning once.’
Tirmithi added also that in this regard there is also the narration of Baraa’ Bin Aazib (radhiyallahu anhu): Tirmithi said:
“The Hadith of Ibn Mas’ood is Hasan.
*This is also the view of many of the Ulama among the Sahaabah of Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wa Sallam) and the Taabieen. This is also the view of Sufyaan and the Ahl-e-Kufa (i.e. the Ulama of Kufa).”
* i.e. The view of Ibn Mas’ood (radhiallahu anhu).
Proof 4
Mahmud Bin Ghailaan al-Marwazi - Wakee’ - Sufyaan - Aasim Bin Kulaib - Abdur Rahmaan Bin al-Aswad - Alqamah - Abdullah (Bin Mas’ood): “Verily he said:
‘Should I not perform with you the Salaat of Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wa Sallam)?’
He then performed Salaat and he did not raise his hands except once.” (Nasaai)
Proof 5
Wakee’ - Sufyaan - Aasim Bin Kulaib - Abdur Rahmaan Bin al-Aswad Alqamah said: “Ibn Mas’ood (radhiyallahu anhu) said:
'Should I not perform for you the Salaat of Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wa Sallam)?’
He then performed Salaat and he did not raise his hands except once.” (Ahmad in his Musnad)
Proof 6
Suwaid Bin Nasr - Abdullah Bin al-Mubaarak - Sufyaan - Aasim Bin Kulaib - Abdur Rahmaan Bin al-Aswad - Alqamah - Abdullah (Bin Mas’ood radhiyallahu 'anhu) said:
“Should I not apprise you of the Salaat of Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wa Sallam)?”
Alqamah said: “He (Ibn Mas’ood) then stood up and firstly raised his hands. Thereafter he never repeated it.” (Nasaai)
Proof 7
Wakee’ - Sufyaan - Aasim Bin Kulaib - Abdur Rahmaan Bin al-Aswad Alqamah - Abdullah Ibn Mas’ood (radhiyallahu anhu) said:
"Should I not show you the Salaat of Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wa Sallam)?"
"He then (performed Salaat) and did not raise his hands except once." (Abu Bakr Bin Abi Shaibah in his Musannaf)
Proof 8
Abu Uthmaan Saeed Bin Muhammad Bin Ahmad al-Hannaat and Abdul Wahhaab Bin Isaa Bin Abi Hayyah- (both from) - Ishaaq Bin Abi Israaeel Muhammad Bin Jaabir - Hammaad - Ibraaheem - Alqamah - Abdullah (Ibn Mas’ood - radhiyallahu anhu) said:
“I performed Salaat with Nabi (Sallallahu alayhi wa Sallam), with Abu Bakr and Umar (radhiyallahu anhuma). They did not raise their hands except at the time of the first Takbeer in the opening of the Salaat.” (Daara Qutni)
Ibn Adi has also narrated the above Hadith with his sanad.
Proof 9
Ibn Abi Dawood - Nu’aim Bin Hamma.ad - Wakee’ - Sufyaan - Aasim Bin Kulaib -Abdur Rahmaan Bin al-Aswad - Alqamah - Abdullah (Ibn Mas’ood - radtfiyallahu anhu) narrated that Nabi (Sallallahu alayhi wa Sallam) would raise his hands in the first Takbeer. Then he would not do so again. (Tahaawi - Sharhi Ma-aanil Aathaar)
Proof 10
Muhammad Bin Nu’maan - Yahya Bin Yahya - Wakee’ - Sufyaan narrated the same text (as above in No. 9) with the same isnaad. (Tahaawi - Sharhi Ma-aanil Aathaar)
Proof 11
Abu Bakrah - Muammal - Sufyaan narrating from Mugheerah said:
“I narrated the Hadith of Waa-il to Ibraaheem, that he (Waa-il) saw Nabi (Sallallahu alayhi wa Sallam) raise his hands when he commenced Salaat, when he made ruku’ and when he lifted his head from ruku’.’
Ibraaheem said: “If it is so that Waa-il saw him doing so once, then (remember that) Abdullah (Ibn Mas’ood) saw him (Rasulullah - Sallallahu alayhi wa Sallam) fifty times not doing this.” (Tahaawi - Sharhi Ma-aanil Aathaar)
Proof 12
Ahmad Bin Abi Dawood - Musaddid - Khaalid Bin AbdUllah - Husain Amr Bin Murrah who said:
“I entered the Musjid of Hadhra Maut and saw Atqamah Bin Waa-il narrating from his father that Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wa Sallam) would raise his hands before ruku’ and after ruku’. I narrated this to Ibraaheem who became angry and said: ‘Waa-il (radhiyallahu anhu) saw him. Ibn Mas’ood (radhiyallahu anhu) and his companions did not see him (Rasulullah - doing so)?” (Tahaawi - Ma-aanil Aathaar)
Proof 13
The companions of Abu Hanifah said:
“Abu Hanifah said that Haremmad narrated from lbraaheem who narrated from Alqamah and AI-Aswad from Abdullah Ibn Mas’ood (radhiyallahu anhu) ‘Verily Nabi (Sallallahu alayhi wa Sallam) would not raise his hands except at the time of commencing Salaat, then he did not at all repeat it. (The As-haab of the Masaaneed of Immam Abu Hanifah)
Many other Muhadditheen have similarly narrated in their treatises, compilations and books.
Some of the asaaneed (chains of narration) of the Hadith of lbn Mas’ood (radhiyallahu anhu) are jayyid (excellent) in terms of the conditions laid down by Imaam Bukhaari and Imaam Muslim.
Some of these amaneed are Hasan. It is valid to cite a Hasan Hadith as proof. On the basis of some of the asaaneed of the Hadith of lbn Mas’ood (radhiyallahu anhu), Hafiz Ibn Hazm, Daara Qutni, Ibnul Qattaan and others have declared the Hadith (of Ibn Mas’ood) to be Saheeh (authentic). Hafiz Ibn Hajr concurs with this verdict in his Talkhees on the Takhreej of Zaila-ee on Hidaayah.”
In a Saheeh Sanad of this Hadith in the Masnad of Abu Bakr Bin Abi Shaibah are five narrators besides Abdullah Ibn Mas’ood (radhiyallahu anhu), viz. Wakee’, Sufyaan, Aasim Bin Kulaib, Abdur Rahmaan Bin al-Aswad and Alqamah. The following are the comments of the authorities of Hadith on the status of these five narrators:
Wakee’ Hafiz Ibn Hair says in Tahzeebut Tahzeeb: “Wakee’ Bin al-Jarraah Bin Maleeh, is the Kufi narrator. He is known as Abu Sufyaan. He narrated from his father and from Ismaaeel Bin Khaalid, Aiman Bin: Waa-il, Ibn Hattn and from numerous others. His sons, Sufyaan, Malee’ and Uyainah narrated from him. His Shaikh was Sufyaan Thauri, the two sons of Abi Shaibah, Abu Haithamah and Humaidi.
Abdullah Bin Ahmad Bin Hambal narrating from his father said: ‘I have not seen a greater man of knowledge and a man with a greater memory than Wakee’.’”
Ahmad Bin Sahl Bin Bahr narrating from Imaam Ahmad said:
“Wakee’ was the Imaam of the Muslimeen in his time.”
Ibn Ma’een said: “I have not seen a better person than Wakee’.”
According to Mulla Ali Qaari, Wakee’ was among the highest ranking narrators of Bukhaari. He was of the Tab-e-Taabieen era. Imaam Abroad said that he preferred Wakee’ to Yahya Bin Saeed. He classified Wakee’ as a great and uprighteous Muhaddith. All the narrators of the Sihaah Sittah narrate fromWakee’.
Sufyaan Bin Saeed Bin Masrooq Thauri Kufi
According to Mulla Ali Qaari in his Tazkirah, Sufyaan was the Imaam of the Muslimeen and a Proof of Allah. His excellences are innumerable. In his time he was an expert in Fiqh, Ijtihaad in Fiqh, Hadith and other branches of knowledge. His piety and authority are accepted by all the authorities of Islam. He too was among the Tab-e-Taabieen.
Abu Aasim said: ‘Sufyaan is the Ameerul Mu’mineen in Hadith.’ Numerous illustrious Ulama and Muhadditheen pay glowing tribute to the sterling qualities of Sufyaan.
All the narrators of the Sihaah Sittah narrate from Sufyaan.
Aasim Bin Kulaib
Mulla Ali Qaari states with regard to Aasim:
“He is Sadooq (extremely truthful), Thiqah (an authoritative and authentic narrator).”
Yahya Bin Ma-een and Nasaai testified to his authenticity and authority in Hadith. Ibnul Qattaan al-Maghribi and Ibn Ham are renowned in Hadith circles. They are extremely severe in assessing narrators. Both have testified to the authenticity of Aasim BinKulaib. Muslim, Abu Dawood, Nasaai, Ibn Majah and Tirmithi narrated his ahaadith.
Abdur Rahmaan Bin al-Aswad
Mullah Ali El-Qaari says in his Tazkirah that Abdur Rahmaan is among the noblest Taa-bieen. His daily practice was 700 raka’ts Nafil Salaat. He would perform Ishaa and Fajr Salaat with one wudhu. He was an embodiment of Ibaadat.
In Tahzeebut Tahzeeb, Hafiz says:
“Abdur Rahmaan Bin al-Aswad heard Ahaadith from his paternal uncle, Alqamah Bin Qais. Aasim Bin Kulaib and others narrate from Abdur Rahmaan al-Aswad. Ibn Ma’een, Nasaai, Ajal, Ibn Kharraash and Ibn Hibbaan declared him a Thiqah (reliable and authentic narrator). The authors of Sihah Sittah narrated from him.
Alqamah Bin Qais
According to Mulla Ali Qaari in Tazkirah, Alqamah was a senior Taabiee. He narrated Ahaadith from Abdullah Ibn Mas’ood and other Sahaabah (radhiyallahu anhum). There is consensus of the Ulama on his greatness. Ibraaheem Nakha’i said:
“Alqamah resembled Abdullah Ibn Mas’ood (radhiyallahu anhu).”
Besides Ibn Majah all the other Muhadditheen narrate his ahaadith. He is of the second generation Muhadditheen.
The integrity and authority of these five illustrious narrators are unimpeachable. Thus, the sanad of the Hadith in Musnad of Abu Bakr Bin Abi Shaibah is Saheeh on the basis of the conditions of Bukhaari and Muslim. Similarly, the Sanad of Abu Dawood is Saheeh on the basis of the conditions of Bukhaari and Muslim. In the Sanad of Abu Dawood appears an extra narrator, viz. Uthmaan Bin Abi Shaibah from whom all the compilers of Sihah Sittala narrate, besides Tirmithi.
The Sanad of the Hadith of Tirmithi is Saheeh on the basis of Muslim’s conditions.
The sanad of Nasaai too is Saheeh in terms of the conditions of Bukhaari and Muslim because in this Sanad only Mahmud Bin Ghailaan has been added to Ibn Abi Shaibah. Besides Abu Dawood the other compilers of the Sihah Sittah narrated ahaadith from him (Mahmud Bin Ghailaan).
Similarly the sanad of Imaam Abu Hanifah regarding the Hadith of Ibn Mas’ood (radhiyallahu anhu) is Saheeh because all the narrators besides Hammaad Bin Abi Sulaimaan are reliable (thiqah) in terms of the conditions of Bukhaari and Muslim. Besides Bukhaari, Muslim and other Muhadditheen narrate from Hammaad Bin Abi Sulaimaan. Thus, his sanad is Saheeh in terms of Muslim.
The Hadith of Baraa’ Bin Aazib (radhiyallahu anhu) also conin’ms that Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wa Sallam) raised his hands only once at the time of Takbeer Tahreemah. His Hadith is narrated by Abdur Razzaaq, Ahmad, Abu Dawood, Ibn Abi Shaibah, Tahaawi, Daara Qutni and others.
Proof 14
Abdur Razzaaq - Ibn Uyainah- Yazeed - Abdur Rahmaan Bin Abi Lailaa Baraa’ Bin Aazib (radhiyallahu anhu) said:
“When Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wa Sallam) recited Takbeer, he would raise his hands until we could see his thumbs near to his ears. Thereafter he would not repeat it in that Salaat.” (Abdur Razzaq’ s Jaami’)
Proof 15
Imaam Ahmad -Hushaim - Yazeed Bin Abi Ziyaad - Abdur Rahmaan Bin Abi Lailaa - Baraa’ Bin Aazib (radhiyallahu anhu) said:
“When Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wa Sallam) recited Takbeer, he would raise his hands until we could see his thumbs near to his ears. Then he would not repeat (Rafa’ Yadain) in that Salaat.” (Musnad Ahmad ibn Hambal)
Proof 16
Abu Dawood - Muhammad Bin Sabaah al-Bazzaar - Shareek- Yazid Bin Abi Ziyaad - Abdur Rahmaan Bin Abi Lailaa - Baraa’ (radhiyallahu anhu) said:
"Verily, Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wa Sallam) would raise his hands near to his ears when he opened (i.e. began) the Salaat, then he would not repeat (it).” (Abu Dawood)
Proof 17
Abu Dawood - Husain Bin Abdur Rahmaan - Wakee’ - Ibn Abi Lailaa - his brother Isaa - Hakam - Abdur Rahmaan Bin Abi Lailaa - Baraa’ Bin Aazib (radhiyallahu anhu) said:
“I: saw Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wa Sallam) raise his hands when he commenced the Salaat. Then he would not raise his hands until he completed (the Salaat).” (Abu Dawood)
Proof 18
Abu Bakr Bin Abi Shaibah - Wakee’ - Ibn Abi Lailaa - Hakam and Isaa - Abdur Rahmaan Bin Abi Lailaa - Baraa’ Bin Aazib (radhiyallahu anhu) said:
“Verily, when Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wa Sallam) commenced the Salaat, he would raise his hands, then he would not raise them (again) until he had completed (the Salaat).” (Abu Bakr Bin Abi Shaibah)
Proof 19
Tahaawi - Abu Bakrah - Muammal - Sufyaan - Yazeed Bin Abi Ziyaad Ibn Abi Lailaa - Baraa’ Bin Aazib (radhiyallahu anhu) said:
“When Nabi (Sallallahu alayhi wa Sallam) would recite Takbeer for beginning the Salaat, he would raise his hands until his thumbs were near to the lobes of his ears. He would then NOT repeat (Rafa’ Yadain).” (Sharh Sunanul Aathaar)
Proof 20
Tahaawi - Ibn Abi Dawood - Amr Bin Aun - Khaalid - Ibn Abi Lailaa - Isaa Bin Abdur Rahmaan - from his father -Baraa’ (Bin Aazib- radhiyallahu anhu) narrated from Nabi (Sallallahu alayhi wa Sallam) Similar to the above Hadith (i.e. No. 19) (Sharh Sunanul Aathaar)
Proof 21
Tahaawi - Muhammad Bin Nu’maan - Yahya Bin Yahya-narrates from both:
1. Wakee’ - Ibn Abi Lailaa - his brother
2. Hakam - Ibn Abi Lailaa
(both from) - Baraa Bin Aazib (radhiyallahu anhu) narrated from Nabi (Sallallahu alayhi wa Sallam) a similar Hadith. (Sharhu Sunanul Aathaar)
Proof 22
Daara Qutni - Ahmad Bin Ali Bin Alalaa’ - Abul Ash’ath - Muhammad Bin Bakr - Shu’ba - Yazeed Bin Abi Ziyaad said:
“I heard Ibn Lailaa say: ‘I heard Baraa (Bin Aazib) in this gathering speaking to people among whom was Ka’b Bin Ujrah. He (Baraa) said:
‘I saw Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wa Sallam) raising his hands when he commenced Salaat in the first Takbeer.’” (Daara Qutni)
Proof 23
Daara Qutni - Yahya Bin Muhammad Bin Saa-id- Muhammad Bin Sulaimaan Luwain - Ismaaeel Bin Zakariyya - Yazeed Bin Abi ZiyaadAbdur Rahmaan Bin Abi Lailaa - Baraa (Bin Aazib - radhiyallahu anhum) saw Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wa Sallam) raising his hands at the time of commencing the Salaat until he brought them in line with his ears. Thereafter he would not at all repeat it (Rafa’ Yadain) until he had completed his Salaat.” (Daara Qutni)
In other words, after Salaat Sayyidina RasuluUah (Sallallahu alayhi wa Sallam) would lift his hands when making dua.
Proof 24
Daara Qutni - Ibn Saa-id - Luwain - Ismaaeel Bin Zakariyya - Yazid Bin Abi Ziyaad - Adi Bin Thaabit - Baraa Bin Aazib (radhiyallahu anhu) narrated similarly. (Daara Qutni)
Proof 25
Daara Qutni - Abu Bakr al-Aadami Abroad Bin Ismaaeel- Abdullah Bin Muhammad Bin Ayyub al-Makhrami _ Ali Bin Aasim - Muhammad Bin Abi Lailaa - Yazid Bin Abi Ziyaad - Abdur Rahmaan Bin Abi Lailaa - Baraa Bin Aazib (radhiyallahu anhu) said:
“I saw Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wa Sallam) when he stood for Salaat, reciting Takbeer and raising his hands until he brought them in line with his ears. Then he did not repeat it.”
(Daara Qutni)
Besides the aforementioned authorities other Muhadditheen too have narrated the Hadith of Baraa’ Bin Aazib (radhiyallahu anhu).
Some of the asaaneed (plural of sanad) of the Hadith of Baraa Bin Aazib (radhiyallahu anhu) are Jayyid (excellent) and Saheeh (authentic) in terms of the conditions of Bukhaari and Muslim or of one of them.
Among the Saheeh asaaneed of this Hadith is the sanad of Abdur Razzaaq. In his sanad are three narrators, viz. Ibn Uyainah, Yazid and Abdur ‘Rahmaan.
With regard to Ibn Uyainah, the Muhadditheen pay glowing tribute to him. In hisTazkirah, Mulla Ali Qaari states that Sufyaan Ibn Uyainah was one of the most senior experts (Hafiz) of Hadith as well as a great expert of Fiqah. He is described as a great Imaam in Hadith, Fiqh and Fatwa.
Hafiz in At-Taqreeb has the same glowing titles for him. The compilers of Sihah Sittar narrate from him.
Regarding Yazid Bin Abi Ziyaad Al-Haashimi, the Muhadditheen differ. Bukhaari applied the principle of Ta’leeq to him. Muslim, Abu Dawood, Nasaai, lbn Majah and Tirmithi have narrated his Hadith.
Regarding Abdur Rahmaan Bin Abi Lailaa Al-Ansaari. He is a Taabi-ee who met 120 Sahaabah. According to the Muhadditheen, he is flawless. The compilers of the Sihah Sitta narrate his Ahaadith.
Thus, the sanad of Baraa’s Hadith as narrated by Abdur Razzaaq is Saheeh in terms of the conditions of Bukhaari and Muslim. ....
Another Hadith on this issue, is the narration of Jaabir Bin Samurah (mdhiyallahu anhu) which is narrated in Saheeh Muslim.
Proof 26
Jaabir (radhiyallahu unhu) said:
“Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wa Sallam) came out (from his house) towards us and said: ‘Why do I see you raising your hands as if (your hands) are the tails of mischievous horses. Be tranquil in Salaat.’”
According to Imaam Bukhaari, this Hadith does not support the Hanafi claim because Abdullah Bin al-Qibti narrates that Jaabir Bin Samurah (radhiyallahu anhu) said:
“We use to perform Salaat behind Nabi (Sallallahu alayhi wa Sallam). When he said ‘Assalamu Alaikum’, we would indicate with our hands on both sides. Then Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wa Sallam) said:
“What is wrong with these people? They point with their hands (i.e. raising them) as if their hands are the tails of mischievous horses. It suffices to place the hands on the thighs, then making salaam to his brother on his right and left side.”
The Ahnaaf counter this argument by averring that these are two different Hadiths. The one narrated earlier (No. 26) refers to Rafa’ Yadain which is the issue now under discussion.
The other Hadith (which is narrated by Abdullah Bin al-Qibti) concerns the practice of raising the hands at the time of making Salaam at the end of Salaat. But this is not the topic being discussed here. This explanation has been tendered by Mulla Ali Qaari in Mirkaat, Sharah Mishkaat.
Imaam Jamaalud-Deen Zaila’i (rahmatullah alayhi) refuted the notion that both - Hadiths No. 26 and the one narrated by Abdullah Bin al-Qibti – are one and the same, stating that it is not said to a person raising his hands upon making salaam: "Be tranquil in Salaat”. These words (Be tranquil in Salaat) are only said to a person who is still in Salaat; in the state of Ruku’ or Sujood or when he stands up for the second, third or fourth rak’at. The application of these words to the latter sense is manifestly clear.
Both the Hadiths are therefore, not the same. The first was narrated by a certain raawi on a certain occasion whilst the second was narrated by another raawi on a separate occasion.
Furthermore, the wording of the two Hadiths negate beyond any doubt the possibility of the two being one and the same. In Hadith No. 26 the raawi says: Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wa Sallam) came out towards us and said ...” This indicates that Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wa Sallam) said these words when he entered the Musjid whilst the Sahaabah were engaged in Salaat.
In contrast, the second Hadith (Narrated by Abdullah Bin al-Qibti) states:
"When we used to perform Salaat behind Nabi (Sallallahu alayhi wa Sallam)...”
The context here (in the Hadith narrated by Abdullah Bin al-Qibti ) shows that Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wa Sallam) spoke after having lead the Sahaabah in Jama’ah (congregational) Salaat when he (Sallallahu alayhi wa Sallam) observed them raising their hands.
The above discussion is sufficient to dispel the opinion of Imaam Bukhaari and establish the view of the Ahnaaf that these (Hadiths No. 26 and the one narrated by Abdullah Bin al-Qibti ) are two different Hadiths.
Proof 27
Another Hadith in substantiation of the Hanafi view is the narration of Hadhrat Ibn Abbaas (radhiyallahu anhu). The Hadith is narrated by Tibraani as follows:
Tibraani - Abelur Rahmaan Bin Abi Lailaa - Hakam - Miqsam - Ibn Abbaas (radhiyallahu anhu) said that Holy Nabi (Sallallahu alayhi wa Sallam) said:
“Do not raise the hands except in seven places.
1. When commencing Salaat.
2. When entering Musjidul Haraam and seeing the Baitullah.
3. When standing on Marwah.
4. When making Wuqoof with the people in Arafaat.
5. At Muzdalifah.
6. At Maqaamain.
7. When pelting the Jamrah.”
(Tibraani)
lmaam Bukhaari narrated this Hadith in his Al-Muj~ad fi Rafi) Yadain. Wakee’ narrated this Hadith also, the sanad being as follows:
Wakee’ - Ibn Abi Lailaa - Hakam - Miqsam- Ibn Abbaas (radhiyallahu anhu).
Proof 28
Another Hadith in support of the Hanafi view is the Hadith of Abbaad Bin Zubair (radhiyallahu anhu).
Baihaqi - Abdullah al-Hafiz - Abul Abbaas Muhammad Bin Ya’qoob Muhammad Bin Ishaaq - Hasan Bin Rahee’ - Hafs Bin Giyaath Muhammad Abi Yahya - Abbaad Bin Zubair who narrated the following Hadith:
“When Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wa Sallam) would open the Salaat, he would raise his hands in the beginning of Salaat. Thereafter he would not at all raise his hands until he completed (the Salaat).’ (Baihaqi)
Commenting on this narration, Imaam Baihaqi said:
“Abbaad is a Taabi-ee, hence this Hadith is of the Mursal category. A Mursal Hadith is acceptable by the Haharisi, especially if it belongs to the Quroon-e-Thalaathah and it is corroborated by other asaaneed.”
Mursal is a Hadith the sanad of which ends at a Tabi-ee - Such a Hadith is authentic - Various factors confer authenticity to a Mursal Hadith, e.g. Ahaadith on the same subject are narrated with other chains (asaaneed) by virtue of which these other Ahaadith acquire a higher status than the Mursal Hadith. Thus, when Ahaadith of a higher classification corroborate a Mursal Hadith, it is accepted as valid and authentic.
In his assessment of the above narration Allaamah Anwar Shah Kashmiri comments:
“I have scrutinized the narrators of its isnaad. The findings of my study indicate that this Hadith is Saheeh (authentic).
Hafiz (Ibn Hajr) gave a direction in ad-Diraayah to study its isnaad. I complied with his order and thoroughly researched it. It is Mursal Jayyid (excellent). If you desire to view my findings take a look at ‘Nailul Farqadain’.”
Proof 29
Ibn Abi Shaibah - Ibn Aadam - Ibn Ayyaash- Abdul Malik Ibnul JabrZubair Bin Adi - Ibraaheem - AI-Aswad who said:
“I performed Salaat with Umar (Ibn Khattaab - radhiyallahu anhu). He did not raise his hands any where in the Salaat, except when he opened the Salaat.”
(Musannaf Ibn Abi Shaibah)
Daara Qutni has also narrated this Hadith with his sanad. Also Imaam Tahaawi has narrated this Hadith with his sanad.
The author of Bazlul Majhood states that the above Hadith is Saheeh (authentic). Although this Hadith is based only on the Raawi, Hasan Bin Ayyaash, he (Hasan Bin Ayyaash) is thiqah (reliable) and hujjat (a proof). This was said by Yahya Bin Ma’een. Ibn Turkemaani furthermore stated that the sanad (chain of narrators) of this Hadith is Saheeh conforming to the conditions laid down by Imaam Muslim.
Proof 30
Imaam Muhammad - Muhammad Bin Abaan Bin Saalih and Abu Bakr Bin Abdullah Nahshali - Aasim Bin Kulaib Jarmi - from his father who was a companion of Hadhrat Ali (karramallah wajhah). He (Kulaib Jarmi) said:
"Hadhrat Ali (karramallah wajhah) would raise his hands in Takbeer Ulaa, i.e. the Takbeer with which the Salaat is opened. Thereafter he never raised his hands anywhere in the Salaat.’ (Muatta Imaam Muhammad)
Proof 31
Ibn Abi Shaibah - Abu Bakrah - Abu Ahmad - Abu Bakr Nahshali - Aasim Bin Kulaib - from his father”(Kulaib Jarmi) who said:
“Ali (radhiyallahu anhu) would raise his hands in the first Takbeer of Salaat. Thereafter he would not raise his hands.” (Ibn Abi Shaibah)
This very same Hadith has been narrated by Imaam Tahaawi with exactly the same sanad from Abu Bakrah.
Proof 32
Ibn Abi Shaibah - Abu Dawood - Ahmad Bin Yunus - Abu Bakr Nahshali Aasim - from his father who was the companion of Ali (radhiyallahu anhu) narrated from Hadhrat Ali the same narration (i.e. as in No. 31 above). (Ibn Abi Shaibah)
Tahaawi and Baihaqi have likewise narrated this Hadith with their respective chains of transmission.
Commenting on this narration, Imaam Tahaawi said that it is not conceivable that Hadhrat Ali (radhiyallahu anhu) would have deliberately abandoned Rafa’ Yadain if it was the permanent practice of Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wa Sallam). Hence, it is evident that according to Hadhrat Ali (radhiyallahu anhu), the practice of Rafa’ Yadain was abrogated.
Commenting on the sanad of this Hadith, Aini says in Sharh Bukhaari:
“The isnaad of the Hadith of Aasim Bin Kulaib is Saheeh in terms of the conditions of Imaam Muslim.”
Hafiz said in ad-Diraayah:
“Its narrators are thiqah (reliable):”
Zaila’i said: “It is an authentic narration.
Proof 33
Imaam Muhammad - Thanri - Husain - Ibraaheem , Ibn Mas’ood (radhiyallahu anhu) - he (i.e. Ibn Mas’ood) would raise his hands when opening Salaat.
(Muatta Imaam Muhammad)
Proof 34
Ibn Abi Shaibah - Wakee’ - Masrood _ Abi Mas’ood - Ibraaheem narrated that Abdullah Ibn Mas’ood (radhiyallahu anhu) would raise his hands in the beginning when commencing Salaat. Thereafter he would not raise his hands.
(Ibn Abi Shaibah)
Tahaawi also narrated this Hadith with his sanad. The isnaad of this Hadith is Mursal Jayyid. (Jayyid - a classification of Hadith stronger than even a Hasan Hadith.) The reason for this Hadith being classified as Mursal is that Ibraaheem never met lbn Mas’ood (radhiyallahu anhu). However, this does not detract from the authenticity and strength of this narration since lbraaheem was in the habit of omitting the narrators between him (Ibraaheem) and Ibn Mas’ood (radhiyallahu anhu) when a great number of raawis had narrated the Hadith to him from Ibn Mas’ood (radhiyallahu anhu).
Imaam Tahaawi narrated the following dialogue between Ibraaheem (Nakha’i) and A’mash:
“A’mash: When you relate a Hadith to me please do name the chain of narrators.
Ibraaheem: When I say: ‘Abdullah said,’ it is only when a large number has narrated the Hadith to me from Abdullah, and if I say: ‘So and so person narrated to me from Abdullah, it is when only that particular person has narrated to me.”
The authenticity of the above Hadith (No. 34) is therefore not tainted in the least by the omission of the narrators between Ibraaheem and Ibn Mas’ood (radhiyallahu anhu). The great Muhaddith Daara Qutni after relating a tradition from Ibraaheem - Abdullah (Bin Mas’ood), acclaims:
“The fact is that despite this narration having an irsaal (omission of a narrator) in it, Ibraaheem Nakha’i is the most enlightened of all people with regard to Abdullah (Bin Mas’ood), his views and his verdicts. He (Ibraaheem) acquired that from his maternal uncles Alqamah, al-Aswad and Abdur Rahmaan, and from other senior students of Abdullah.”
Proof 35
Imaam Muhammad - Muhammad Bin Abaan Bin Saalih-Abdul Aziz Bin Hakeem who said:
“I saw Ibn Umar (radhiyallahu anhu) raising his hands in line with his ears in the first Takbeer opening the Salaat and he did not raise his hands besides this (one occasion).” (Muatta Imaam Muhammad)
Proof 36
Ibn Abi Shaibah - Abu Bakr Bin Ayyaash - Husain - Mujaahid who said:
"I did not see Ibn Umar (radhiyallahu anhu) raising his hands except in the beginning of opening (the Salaat).” (Musannaf Ibn Abi Shaibah)
Proof 37
Tahaawi - Ibn Abi Dawood - Ahmad Bin Yunus - Abu Bakr Bin Ayyaash Husain - Mujaahid who said:
“I performed Salaat behind Ibn Ulnar (radhiyallahu anhu). He would not raise his hands except in the first Takbeer.” (Sharh Ma-aanil Aathaar)
Commenting on this Hadith, Imaam Tahaawi said:
“This is Ibn Umar (radhiyallahu anhu) who has seen Nabi (Sallallahu alayhi wa Sallam) making rafa’ (raising the hands) then he abandoned it after Nabi (Sallallahu alayhi wa Sallam). It is inconceivable for this except that he was convinced of the abrogation of what he had seen Nabi (Sallallahu alayhi wa Sallam) doing. Thus the proof for this has been established.”
Imaam Ibn Humaam reports this narration in Tahreerul Usool. Similarly, Baihaqi in his al-Ma’rifah narrated it. The sanad of Tahaawi for this Hadith is Saheeh.
Ibn Abi Shaibah mentions the following authorities of the Shariah who negate Rafa’ Yadain at the time of ruku’ and when rising from ruku’: Hadhrat Ali (radhiyallahu anhu) and his companions, Ibn Mas’ood (radhiyallahu anhu), Ibraaheem Nakha’i, Haithamah, Qais, Ibn Abi Lailaa, Mujaahid, Alswad, Sha’bi, Abu Ishaaq, Imaam Abu Hanifah, Imaam Maalik (rahmatullah alayhim), and others - all of whom are elite members of the Salaf-e-Saaliheen.
Proof 38
Abu Bakr Bin Ayyaash narrates that Mujaahid said:
“I performed Salaat behind Ibn Umar (radhiyallahu anhu) for a number of years (in one narration, ten years). He did not raise his hands except in Takbeer Ulaa (the first Takbeer).”
This sanad is Saheeh. When a Sahabi’s action conflicts with his own narration, then in terms of the principles of Hadith, it (his action) indicate, abrogation of what he had narrated.
Al-Qastalaani in Sharh Bukhaari claims that Abu Bakr Bin Ayyaash, narrator in the sanad (of No. 38 above) is dhaeef (weak). However, this claim itself is weak and incorrect because Imaam Bukhaari and Imaam Muslim, both have declared him to be Thiqah (reliable, authentic). They both narrate his ahaadith.
Furthermore, the Muhadditheen of the four other Saheeh compilations have also narrated his ahaadith. Hence, the statement by Qastalaani is unacceptable in view of his (Abu Bakr Bin Ayyaash’s) ahaadith being accepted and narrated by Bukhaari and Muslim.
Also, Hafiz has praised him. Thauri, Ibn Mubaarak and Ibn Mahdi likewise lauded praise on him. Imaam Ahmad Bin Hambal said: “He (Ayyaash) is truthful”. Yahya Bin Ma-een said: “He is Thiqah.”
Proof 39
It is narrated from Abu Hurairah (radhiyallahu anhu) that he used to raise his hands when commencing Salaat and he used to say in every descent and ascent (i.e. when going down and rising up): “Allaahu Akbar. He would say as well:
“I am more of a resemblance to the Salaat of Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wa Sallam) than you.”
(Hafiz Abu Amr in al-Istithkaar and Aini in Mabaanil Akhbaar citing at-Tamheed)
Proof 40
Ahmad bin Yoonus - Abu Bakr Bin Ayyaash:
“I never saw a Faqeeh doing it; raising his hands in other than the first Takbeer.” (Tahaawi)
Proof 41
Yet another Hadith in substantiation of the Hanafi practice of only raising the hands at the beginning of Salaat is one narrated by Baihaqi in al-Khilaafiyyaat and Zaila’i in Nasbur Raayah from Ibn Umar (radhiyallahu anhu):
“Verily, Nabi (Sallallahu alayhi wa Sallam) used to raise his hands when commencing Salaat. Then he would not do so again.”
Haakim said that this Hadith is Baatil (false) and Mawdhoo’ (fabricated). However this claim of Haakim is itself Baatil. The Ahnaaf state that Haakim’s claim is utterly baseless. Haakim could not find anyone on the sanad of the Hadith whom he could disparage.
Shaikh Aahid as-Sindi averred that its narrators are authentic and reliable. This he stated in al-Mawaahibul Lateefah.
It should be borne in mind that Hadhrat Ibn Mas’ood (radhiyallahu anhu) was a very senior Sahaabi who was constantly in the company of Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wa Sallam), so much so, that the impression of him being a member of the Ahl-e-Bait (Rasulullah’s family) was created. He followed Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wa Sallam) in all five Salaat on a daily basis. Hence, his explicit negation of Rafa’ Yadain categorically confirms that Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wa Sallam) had discontinued the earlier practice of raising the hands.
An argument advanced to refute the Hanafi argument is that the Hadith of Baraa’ Bin Aazib (radhiyallahu anhu) has been proclaimed to be dhaeef since one of the narrators in one of the Chains is Muhammad Bin Abi Lailaa who has been described as dhaeef by Abu Dawood. This argument holds no substance because the Hanafi case is not based solely on the Hadith of Baraa Bin Aazib (radhiyallahu anhu) with the sanad in which Muhammad Bin Abi Lailaa appears. There are a number of Saheeh asaaneed (Chains of narration) in which Muhammad Bin Abi Lailaa does not feature at all. Thus, the many other Saheeh asaaneed serve to corroborate the sanad in which Muhammad Bin Abi Lailaa features. The cumulative effect of the Saheeh asaaneed of the Hadith of Baraa’ Bin Aazib (radhiyallahu anhu) elevates the sanad in which appears Muhammad Bin Abi Lailaa, hence that Hadith too is acceptable.
Furthermore, some of these ahaadith are authentic in terms of the conditions of either both Bukhaari and Muslim or in terms of the conditions of one of them, especially the sanad of Abdur Razzaaq. The authenticity of Abdur Razzaaq’s sanad is based on the conditions of both El-Bukhaari and Muslim.
The argument that Yazeed Bin Ziyaad in this sanad is weak, is not valid because in Sharhul Bukhaari, Aini states:
“Undoubtedly, this Yazeed has been authenticated (declared as Thiqah) by AI-Ajli, Ya’qoob Bin Sufyaan, Ahmad Bin Saalih, Sabaahi and Ibn Hibbaan.”
Also Muslim and Ibn Khuzaimah record his narration in their Saheeh. Moreover, Yazeed is not the solitary narrator of this Hadith. Isaa Abdur Rahmaan too narrated it from lbn Abi Lailaa. Similarly, Hakam has narrated it also from Ibn Abi Lailaa as recorded by Abu Dawood and others. In his Tahzeeb, Hafiz says that Muslim has also narrated the Hadith of Yazeed.
Since this narrator, viz. Yazeed, is among the narrators of Saheehain (Bukhaari and Muslim), no credence can be accorded to anyone who seeks to impugn him.
Proof 42
Shah Anwar Kashmiri states in Nailul Farqadain:
“At this juncture one should not forget that the view of those who do not make Raf Yadain is ‘Admi’ (i.e. they prove the non-existence or a certain act.). Taking this into account, their view is also supported by all those Ahaadith which describe the Salaat of Rasullullah Sallallahu alayhi wa Sallam but make no mention of Raf’ Yadain, neither affirming it nor denying it. This is so because, had there been Raf’ Yadain, these Ahaadith would not have been silent on the issue.”
In view of what Hadhrat Shah Kashmiri Sahib has stated, the Ahaadith that support the Hanafi view are indeed numerous. It would require a few volumes to attempt to record them. It this brief booklet only those Ahaadith have been recorded that explicitly negate Raf’ Yadain.
Conclusion
The Hadith narrations presented in this treatise in substantiation of the Hanafi viewpoint are all Saheeh (authentic) according to the Muhadditheen, including Shaikhaan (i.e. Imaam Bukhaari and Imaam Muslim).
All unbiased Muslims who are in pursuit of the truth will understand after having studied this short treatise, that the Hanafi practice of refraining from Rafa’ Yadain is not based on only rational/logical arguments, but is the product of authentic narrational evidence (Ahaadith). In view of the validity of the arguments and grounds of the Hanafi Mathhab, there is no controversy among the followers of the four Madhhabs on this issue. Each one follows the teachings of his Mathhab without attempting to denigrate the followers of the other Mathaahib.
Only followers of baatil such as the modernist Najdis, are bigoted in the matter of valid ikhtilaafaat (differences) based on Haqq (Truth). It is their baatil which constrains them to embark on their pernicious exercises of disparaging Al-Imaam Al-A’zam Abu Hanifah (rahmatullah alayhi) in particular. But the Truth cannot be suppressed for too long.
"Truth has come and falsehood has perished. Verily falsehood (by its very nature)is perishable” (Holy Qur’aan)

Fazial Sadqat (Story No.17)


Fazial Sadqat (Story No.17).
Once there was a famine I Egypt, during the time when Abdul Hamid bin Sad Rahmatullah alaihe was the governor there. Abdul Hamid said to himself, I shall show to Shaitan that I am his enemy (i.e. I shall defy Shaitan who prompts a person to spend very scrupulously, in such Circumstances.). He made a proclamation that all the poor and needy ones of the country should come to the governor s house for their (daily) meals every day, till he prices came down . So, The needy persons continued to come and have meals with him at his house till the famine passed away and things were available at normal rates.  It so chanced that, when prices were normalized, he was removed from his office. It was estimated, at the time of his departure from Egypt, that he owed a million (1000, 000) Dirham’s. Abdul hamid Rahatullah alaihe later tried to redeem the pledged valuables, but he could not raise the money and, therefore, wrote to the businessmen, after some time, I authorize to sell all valuables laying in pledge with you, to pay off all my debts out of the money thus received , and to distribute the balance among such needy ones as a I could not help during my stay in Egypt . (It-haff). No less generous were the ladies of those times, who gave away their ornaments to be sold and distributed among the poor and the needy ones!

Thursday 24 January 2013

Fazial Sadqat (Story No.16)

Fazial Sadqat (Story No.16).
Abdullah Bin Aamir Bin Kuraiz Rahmatullah alaihe purchased neighboring house form Khalid bin Uqabah Umawi Radhiallaho anho for ninety thousand Dirhams,as he needed it for his personal use. When Khalid s Family came to know of it, they were grieved .That night Abdullah bin Aamir heard a wailing sound coming from the house and when he asked the ladies of his family what is meant , they told him that someone of Khalids family was crying with grief over the sale of their house. At this, Ibe Aamir Rahmtullah alaihe immediately sent his servant to Khalid with the word that Ibne Aamir had given the house as a gift to Khalids family and that he would not take back the price of the house form him.
 ( it-Haaf).

Fazial Sadqat (Story No.15)


Fazial Sadqat (Story No.15).
Abu Marthad Rahmatullah alaihe was famous for his generosity. Once a person came and directed a few Verses in praise of his generosity. (When you praise a generous man, it is understood that you are seeking a favor). Abu Marthad Rahmatullah alaihe said to the man, I have nothing to give you at the moment. But I can help you by a subtle device; if you file a suit against me with the Qadhi (judge) saying that I owe you ten thousand (Dirham’s or Dinars), I Shall admit that I owe you the money (since I have promised, the amount has become due from me to you; as a Hadith says (A promise is a debt).
The Qadhi (judge) will send me to prison and my people will raise the money o get me released. The man did as he was directed. Abu Marthad was sent to prison and his relatives raised the necessary amount of money (to get him release), which they give to the Qadhi in the evening. Thus, the man got ten thousand (Dirham’s or Dinars) and Abu Marthad Rahmatullah alaihe was released.
 (It-haaf)

Fazial Sadqat (Story No.14)


Fazial Sadqat (Story No.14).
Once there was a famine I Egypt, during the time when Abdul Hamid bin Sad Rahmatullah alaihe was the governor there. Abdul Hamid said to himself, I shall show to Shaitan that I am his enemy (i.e. I shall defy Shaitan who prompts a person to spend very scrupulously, in such Circumstances.). He made a proclamation that all the poor and needy ones of the country should come to the governor s house for their (daily) meals every day, till he prices came down . So, The needy persons continued to come and have meals with him at his house till the famine passed away and things were available at normal rates.  It so chanced that, when prices were normalized, he was removed from his office. It was estimated, at the time of his departure from Egypt, that he owed a million (1000, 000) Dirham’s. Abdul hamid Rahatullah alaihe later tried to redeem the pledged valuables, but he could not raise the money and, therefore, wrote to the businessmen, after some time, I authorize to sell all valuables laying in pledge with you, to pay off all my debts out of the money thus received , and to distribute the balance among such needy ones as a I could not help during my stay in Egypt . (It-haff). No less generous were the ladies of those times, who gave away their ornaments to be sold and distributed among the poor and the needy ones!

Fazial Sadqat (Story No.13)


Fazial Sadqat (Story No.13).
Saeed bin Aamir Radhiallaho anho was the governor of Hims, during the time of Khalifah Umar Radhiallaho anho .The Citizens of Hims lodged many complaints against him and demanded his removal from the office.Now Umar Radhiallaho anho was gifted, by Allah Taala with exceptional wisdom, which gave a keen eye for character-traits and  an exceptional understanding of human natural quality that he had tried out thousands of times and found to be unerring so ,he was surprised to hear these complaints, as he had made the appointment considering Saeed Radhiallaho anho to be the most eligible person for governorship. Accordingly, he said in an invocation to Allah, O Allah! Do not take away my power of discernment and my intuitive knowledge of human nature! For if I am deprived of this quality .I fear that I might consign all the affairs of my caliphate t inefficient persons! The Khalifah then sent for saeed Radhiallaho anho and the complainants. When they appeared in the court, he asked them to recount their grievances. They had complained that their governor came out of his house late in the morning, that he did not grant them audience during the hours of night and that he observed holiday every month. So Umar Radhiallaho anho asked the complainants to stand face to face with their governor and state their grievances one by one .He told the governor to answer the accusations. One after the other.
They said that he came out of his house late in the morning and Saeed Radhiallaho anho explained: I and my wife are living together alone. There is no one else to help her in her household jobs. So I do the job of preparing bread for the family. When the meal is ready, we eat it together. Then I perform Wuhu and come out of the house.
Umar Radhiallaho anho told the complainants to state the next grievance and they said that their governor did not grant them audience during the hours of night. He demanded the explanation from Saeed Radhiallaho anho,Wo said, I did not want to reveal the actual position. I have reserved the day –time for the service of Allah s Creatures, and devoted the entire night for devotion; I keep awake and worship my lord the whole night through  Umar Radhiallaho anho then asked them about their third complaint and they said that their governor observed a holiday every month .When asked to explain, Saeed Radhiallaho anho said: I have no servant, and so I have to stop work once during a month to wash my clothes. I wash my clothes in the morning and, when they become dry; in the evening I am put them on again and come out of the house.
·       Hearing this , Umar Radhiallaho anho bowed I gratitude t Allah Taala for protecting him form going wrong in the exercise of his power of selection and advised the people to have due regard for their governor and to be thankful to Allah Taala for entrusting their affairs to such a pious person .Which all of them were gone ,Umar Radhiallaho anho sent a gift  of one thousand Dinars (Gold pieces) to Saeed for his personal use .when he received the amount ,his wife said ,Our  Thanks are due to Allah, Who has arranged for so many of our requirements. We can hire an attendant with this money and also fulfill many other needs. Saeed Radhiallho anho Said, there are a good many poor and needy people living in the city, who stand in greater need of this money .I suggest that we should distribute it among them. His wife happily agreed to the suggestion and they distributed a large portion of the amount among the poor and the orphans, sending a small bag of Dinars to this one and a small bag to that one. Then Saeed Radhiallaho anho said to his wife, keep with you what remains and spend it little by little on your needs. She proposed that he should hire a servant to help him in household affairs, but Saeed Radhiallaho anho said No, you will soon have many people coming to you who need this money more than we do.
               (Ash-hur)  

Founder of Tableeghi Jamaat - Part 2


 Founder of Tableeghi Jamaat(Maulana Ilyas) - Part 2

Ardor and eagerness 

Ardor and eagerness, without which no real success is possible in any field, were deeply rooted in him. It was by sheer determination and earnestness that he accomplished what he did in spite of persistent ill-health. One day, during his last illness, Maulana Mohammad Ilyas related that "once I was so ill and feeling so weak that I could not go down the stairs. All of a sudden, I heard that Maulana Saharanpuri had come to Delhi and I was so excited that I left for Delhi immediately on foot and forgot all about my illness and exhaustion. It was in the way that I remembered I was sick.

Contact with other spiritual mentors 

Regular contact with other spiritual mentors and disciples of Maulana Gangohi was maintained during those days. About Shah Abdur Rahim Raipuri and Maulana Ashraf Ali Thanwi he used to say that they abided in his heart. They, too, had a great regard and affection for him owing to his extraordinary qualities.


Spirit of Jehad 

Together with Zikr, Saga (spiritual exercises and exertions) Nawafil and Ibadaat, Maulana Mohammad Ilyas was, also, infused with the spirit of Jehad. Throughout his life, he was never without it, and had, in fact, taken the pledge of Jehad at the hand of Maulana Mahmood Hasan for that very reason.


Estimation in the eyes of elders 

From his early days, he was held in the highest esteem by the elders of the family as well as the spiritual leaders of the day. Maulana Mohammad Yahya was like a father to him, yet the former's attitude towards his younger brother was like that of the sacred Prophet towards Hazrat Usman Indifferent health prevented him from taking part in duties involving physical labor. He concentrated wholly on his studies, and on Zikr, and other forms of worship. Maulana Mohammad Yahya, on the contrary, was a very industrious person. He owned a bookshop which he managed with great care. It was not only his source of livelihood, but of his brothers as well. One day, the manager of the shop said that Maulana Mohammad Ilyas did not take any interest in the business which was not good for him, too, benefited from it. When Maulana Mohammad Yahya heard of it, he was very angry and remarked that "a Tradition has it that the sustenance that reaches you and the help you receive from the Lord is due to the blessedness of the weaker ones among you. I believe that I am receiving my sustenance owing to the good fortune of this child. Nothing should be said to him in future. If there is anything to say, it should be said to me.

Sometimes, Maulana Mohammad Ilyas was asked to lead the service in the presence of renowned theologians and spiritual leaders. Once Shah Abdur Rahim Raipuri, Maulana Khalil Ahmad Saharanpuri and Maulana Ashraf Ali Thanwi happened to be in Kandhla. When the time for Salaat came and Maulana Mohammad Ilyas was asked to lead it, a senior member of the family, Molvi Badrul Hasan, humorously remarked that "such a small engine has been fastened to so many big carriages." "It depends on the power (not the size of the engine", replied one of them.

Career with a teacher in Mazaahirul Uloom 

In 1910, a large number of men, including most of the senior teachers of the Madrassa of Mazaahirul Uloom, left for the Haj from Saharanpur. It necessitated the recruitment of new teachers for the Madrassa, Maulana Mohammad Ilyas being one of them. He was given the secondary books to teach. On the return of the senior teachers from the Pilgrimage, all the new entrants were relieved of their duties, but the services of Maulana Mohammad Ilyas were retained.

At Mazaahirul Uloom, the Maulana had to teach some books which he had not read himself as, in Maulana Mohammad Yahya's scheme of instruction, it was not customary to complete the books, and Maulana Mohammad Ilyas, further, had to miss some secondary books owing to ill-health. During his teaching days, he tried hard to make up for the deficiency and prepared his lectures carefully. For instance, for teaching Kinzul Daqa'iq, he studied Bahr-ur-Ra'iq, Shaami and Hadaya, and consulted even Hisami's notes and comments when he taught Nurul Anawaar.

Marriage 

The Maulana married the daughter of his maternal uncle, Maulana Rauful Hasans on Friday, October 17, 1912 was performed by Maulana Mohammad, and Maulana Khalil Ahmad Saharanpuri, Shah Abdur Rahim Raipuri an Maulana Ashraf Ali Thanwi, all the three of them, attended the ceremony. Maulana Thanwi's celebrated sermon, Fuwayid us Suhbat, which has subsequently been published times without number, was delivered on that occasion.

First Haj 

In 1915, Maulana Khalil Ahmad Saharanpuri and Maulana Mahmood Hasan, decided lo go on the Haj Pilgrimage. When Maulana Mohammad Ilyas came to know of it, he was strongly seized with the desire to perform the Haj. He felt that it would become dark and gloomy in India with their departure and he would not be able to live in Saharanpur any more. But there was the question of permission. As his sister, the wife of Molvi Ikrarnul Hasan, saw his distress, she offered her ornaments to meet the expenses of the Pilgrimage. Contrary to expectations, the Maulana's mother gave her consent. after which Maulana Mohammad Yahya, also, agreed. The Maulana, then, wrote to Maulana Khalil Ahmad Saharanpuri asking for his permission, and explained that as far as she wherewithal for the journey was concerned, three courses were open to him. He could take his sister's ornaments or borrow the amount or accept the offers of money made by certain relatives. Maulana Khalil Ahmad Saharanpuri preferred the third course. Maulana Mohammad Ilyas was fortunate enough to travel by the same boat as Maulana Khalil Ahmad Saharanpuri. He sailed in August, 1914 , and returned in February, 1915, to resume the teaching at the Madrassa.

Death of Maulana Mohammad Yahya 

The death of Maulana Mohammad Yahya, on Wednesday, the 9th of August, 1915, was an extremely sad and frustrating event for the Maulana. In addition to being a most affectionate brother, he was, also, his teacher and benefactor. He could not get over the shock till the end of his days. He used to get lost in thought and a peculiar kind of abstraction took possession of him when he talked about his brother.

Stay at Nizamuddin

Two years after the death of Maulana Mohammad Yahya, the eldest brother of Maulana Mohamad Ilyas, Maulana Mohammad, also, passed away. He was a man of angelic disposition and an embodiment of affection, piety and humility. He loved solitude and cared little for worldly comforts. He lived in Bangle Wali Masjid, at Nizamuddin, in the place of his late father. There was a Madrassa in the mosque which had been founded by Maulana Mohammad Ismail. Only primary education was imparted in it, and, among its pupils were mostly the children from Mewat. It had no regular source of income and reliance was placed solely upon God for meeting its needs.

Many people of Delhi and Mewat were devoted to Maulana Mohammad and had benefited from his guidance. His face had the radiance of spirituality. He, often, gave the sermon, but in an informal, conversational way. He remained seated during it, and, generally, read out the Traditions on good morals and Zuhd, ( Islamic asceticism ) and explained their meaning in a simple language.

Once Maulana Mohammad developed a boil under an eye which had to be opened seven times. The doctors insisted on administering the anesthetic but he refused to take it and lay motionless throughout the operation. The surgeon, afterwards, said, that he had not seen the like of it in his life.

Maulana Mohammad spent most of his time in prayer and meditation. During the 16 years before his death, he did not miss the Tahajjud( before dawn prayer ) prayers even once, and breathed his last while performing the Sajda in the Namaz of Witr.

Maulana Mohammad Ilyas had route to Delhi to look after his sick brother and was staying with him in the Nawab Wali Masjid of Qassab Pura. It was there that Maulana Mohammad died and the burial took place at Nizamuddin. Thousands of men attended the funeral.

After the burial, people urged upon Maulana Muhammad Ilyas to take up residence at Nizamuddin in order to fill the void caused by the death of his father and brother. They, also, promised monthly donations for the Madrassa to which the Maulana agreed subject to certain conditions which he observed throughout his life.

Maulana Mohammad Ilyas had made it clear that he would come to Nizamuddin and take charge of the Madrassa only if Maulana Khaiil Ahmad Saharanpuri approved. Upon it, several persons offered to go to Saharanpur to obtain the permission, but Maulana Mohammad Ilyas checked them saying that it was not the way to do it. He would go himself, unaccompanied by anyone.

The Maulana, thus, went to Saharanpur and explained the whole thing to Maulana Khalil Ahmad. The latter gave his approval, but added that, in the first instance, only a year’s Ieave be taken from Mazaahirul Uloom and if the stay at Nizamuddin proved useful and it was decided to settle down there permanently, he could resign at any time.

But before Maulana. Muhammad Ilyas could move to Nizamuddin, he was suddenly taken ill with pleurisy and went to Kandhla where his condition worsened. One night his illness took such a grave turn that all hope was lost. The pulse sank and the body became cold, but God had to take some work from him. unexpectedly, he began to improve, and, in a few days, was able to leave the bed.

On regaining health, Maulana came to Nizamuddin from Kandhla. In those days, there was no habitation in that part of Nizamuddin, and, adjoining the mosque, there was a thick growth of trees and underbrush. Maulana Ihtishamul Hasan who, in his childhood, had come to live, for sometime, with Maulana Mohammad Ilyas tells that “I used to go out and stand in the hope of seeing ‘a human face. When anyone appeared, I felt so happy as if someone had given me a precious gift.”

A small pucca (built of bricks) mosque, a shed, a living apartment, a small settlement of the attendants of the tomb to the south of it, and a few Mewati and non-Mewati students that as all that formed the world of the mosque and the Madrassa.

The resources of the Madrassa were so meager that, some times, they had to starve, but. the Maulana bore it all with a cheerful heart. Occasionally, be would say plainly, that there was nothing to eat. Whoever wanted to stay’ might stay and whoever wanted to go might go and make his arrangement elsewhere. The moral and spiritual training the students were receiving, however, was such that none of them. was willing to leave. Often, they would live on wild fruits. The scholars themselves brought wood from the forest to prepare the chappati (flat bread) which they ate with chutney (pickle) The extreme poverty made no impression on the Maulana. What worried him was the prospect of abundance and prosperity which, he was sure, was going to open up, according to the practice of the Lord, after the phase of trial and tribulation.

The outward appearance of the Madrassa held no interest for the Maulana. He was supremely unconcerned with it. Once, during his absence, some residential quarters were built for its staff through the efforts of Haji Abdur Rahman, an old friend of his and an ex-student of the Madrassa, which made the Maulana so angry that he did not speak to him for a long time. The Maulana remarked that the real thing was education, and, referring to a certain Madrassa, said that its building had become pucca, but the standard of education had gone down.

Once a prominent merchant of Delhi begged the Maulana to supplicate to the Lord for him in a very important matter, and presented him a purse. The Maulana agreed to pray on his behalf, but declined to accept the’ money. Haji Abdur Rahman, however, took it in view of the chronic financial difficulties of the Madrassa, but the Maulana had no peace until he had it returned. He used to impress upon Haji Abdur Rahrnan that the work of faith was not carried out with motley, otherwise much wealth would have been granted to the holy Prophet

Worshipfulness 
Maulana Mohamrnad Ilyas, exclusively, kept himself occupied with prayers and other spiritual exertions in those days. He had inherited the inclination for it from his ancestors which blossomed up during the stay at Nizamuddin. He sought solitude and carried out vigorous exercises for the purification of the soul. According to Haji Abdur Rahman, the Maulana remained in seclusion for long hours at the gate of Arab Sara which was the favorite place of worship of Hazrat Nizmuddin Aulia, and was situated to he north of Humayun’s tomb. near the mausoleum of Abdur Rahim Khan Khana and the grave of Syed Nur Mohammad Badaynni, the spiritual mentor of Mazhar jan-i-Janan. Usually, his mid-day meal was sent there while the evening meal he took at home, He offered the five daily prayers in congregation. Haji Abdur Rahman and his fellow students used to go to the gate to form the congregation, and for their lessons, they, sometimes, went there, and, some times, the Maulana himself came to Chukkar Wali Masjid.

The Maulana performed the Wuzu (abulation) and offered two Rak’ats of Namaz before commencing the lesson of the Traditions, and remarked that the claim of the Traditions was even greater. He did not talk to anyone, however important, while teaching the Traditions, nor ever complained if the meal came late from Nizamuddin, nor found fault with food.

Interest in teaching 
The Maulana took keen interest in his pupils and personally taught all the subjects, elementary as well as advanced. Sometimes, he had as many as eighty students directly under his instruction, and took the class of Mustadrak_i_Haakim before Fajr.

The main emphasis in his method of teaching was on the application of mind. He wanted the students to come thoroughly prepared. The Maulana did not follow the general syllabus of the Madrassas in the selection of books and many books that were but prescribed in the other Madrassas were taught at Nizamuddin He thought of new ways to stimulate the students and develop the faculties of imagination and understanding in them.

Beginnings of the movement of Religious Reform in Meewat

The area to the south of Delhi where the Meos have been settled from the olden days is called Mewat, Presently, it includes the Gurgaon district of the Punjab, the native states of Alwar and Bharatpur and the district of Mathura of the United Provinces. Like all other regions, its boundaries, too, have been changing from time to time and the dimensions of the old Mewat must have been different from what they are now.

The English historians hold that the Meos do not come from the Aryan stock, but are related to the non-Aryan races of ancient India. Their history, thus, dates far back than that of the Rajput families of Aryan blood. According to them, the Khanzadas (lowest order of Mughal nobility) of Mewat, however, belong to the same ethnic group as the Rajputs, and, in the Persian history books, wherever the word ‘Mewati’ occurs, it denotes the very Khanzadas. We, further, learn from Ain-i-Akbari that the Jatau Rajputs came to be known as Mewatis on embracing Islam.
In the annals of Firoz Shahi dynasty, Mewat is mentioned, for the first time, in the memoirs of Shamsuddin Al-timash. The Mewatis had become very troublesome during the early days of the Muslim Kingdom of Delhi. Aided by the long range of thick forests that extended up to Delhi, they used to raid it frequently and had become such a terror that the gates of the capital were shut at sunset. Still, they managed to enter the town in the night in search of plunder. Ghayasuddin Balban, thereupon, dispatched a strong military force against the Mewatis, killing a large number of them. Outposts manned by the Afghan soldiers were set up in Delhi, the surrounding forests were cut down and the land was brought under cultivation. Mewat, thereafter, remained in oblivion for about a hundred years

After the long lull, the Mewati adventuress, again, became active and started harassing the people of Delhi which forced the authorities to take punitive action against them from time to time. The names of Bahadur Nahir and his successors are, particularly, mentioned in the chronicles in this connection. They succeeded in establishing the Kingdom of Mewat which was, later, reduced to a Jagir (a feudal estate) by the rulers of Delhi.

Another prominent Mewatis was Lakhan Pal who brought the whole of Mewat and its outlying territory under his domination. He embraced Islam during die reign of Firoz Shah.

Moral and religious condition 
Owing to the negligence of the Muslims religious teachers, the moral arid religious condition of the Mewatis had sunk so low that there was little to distinguish between their beliefs and practices and wholesale apostasy. Even non-Muslim historians have commented at length on their estrangement with Islam, as the following extract from the Alwar Gazetteer of 1878, written by Major Powlett, will show:



“All the Meos are, now, Muslims, but only in name. Their village deities are the same as those of the Hindu landlords, and they celebrate several Hindu festivals. Holi is a season of special rejoicing among the Mewatis and they observe it like their own festivals, such as, Moharrum, ‘Id and Shab-i-Barat. The same is the case with Janam Ashtami, Dussehra and Diwali, The Meos engage the services of the Brahmins to fix the dates of marriages. They have Hindu names, with the exception of the word ‘Ram’, and their last name, often, is ‘Singh’, though not as frequently as ‘Khan’. Like Ahirs and Gujars, the Mewatis, too, observe Amawas as a holiday on which they abstain from work. When they build a well, they begin with the construction of a parapet in the name of Beeriyi or Hanuman, but when it comes to pillage, they do not show much reverence to the Hindu temples and other places of religious significance. If, on such an occasion, their attention is drawn to the sanctity of these establishments, they, unhesitatingly, says, ‘You are "Does" and we are "Meos".’ Meos are, largely, ignorant of their faith, i. e., Islam. Very few of them know the Kalima,’ and fewer still observe Namaz regularly. About the hours and rules of namaz, their ignorance is complete. This is the state of the Meos of Alwar. In the British territory of Gurgaon, the position is a little better because of the Madrassas. In some parts of Alwar, also, where the mosques have been built, the religious duties are observed to some extent. A few of them know the Kalima and offer up namaz and an attachment for the Madrassas, also, is found among them. As we have seen earlier, the initial ceremonies of marriage are performed by the Brahmins, but the real ceremony (of nikah) is performed by the Qazi. Men wear dhoti and loin-cloth. The pajamas are not worn at all. Their dress, thus, is wholly Hinduised. Even ornaments of gold are worn by men.”

At another place, Major Powlett writes: 
“The Meos are half-Hindu by their habits. Mosques are rarely to be seen in their villages. There are only eight mosques in the fifty villages of the tehsil of Tijarah. Leaving aside the temples, the places of worship of the Meos are very much similar to those of their Hindu neighbors. These are known, for instance as Paanch Peera, Bhaisa and Chahand Chahand or Khera Deo is consecrated to the service of Maha Davi where animals are offered as a sacrifice. In Shah-i-Barat, the banner of Syed Salar Masud Ghazi is worishipped in all Meo villages.”

Similarly, ii the Gazetteer of Gtrgaon (1910), it is stated that ‘‘the Meos, still, are a very loose and careless type of Muslims. They share most of tile customs of the neighboring community specially those which possess an element of fun and merriment . Their basic rule seems to be to observe the religious celebrations of both the communities and disregard the religious duties of either. Lately, some religious teachers have appeared in Mewat and a few Meos have started to keep the fasts of Ramzan and to build mosques in their villages and observe namaz. Their women, too, have taken to wearing Pyjamas instead of the Hindu Chagras. All these are the signs of religious awakening.”

The Gazetteer of Bharatpur, again, says: 

“The customs of Meos are a mixture of Hindu and Muslim customs. They observe circumcision, perform nikah and bury their dead. They make a pilgrimage to the tomb of Syed Salar Masud Giiazj at Bahraich, and attach a great importance to the vow taken under his banner, and consider it a religious duty to fulfill it. They, also, visit the other shrines of India, but do not perform the Hajj. Among the Hindu festivals, they celebrate Holi antI Diwali. They do not marry in the family or in their own branch or sub­division of the clan, girls do not have a share in ancestral property, and they give mixed Hindu and Muslim names to their children. They are, wholly, illiterate and have a fair number of bards and minstrels among them whom they pay liberally. Many quatrains on the themes of agriculture and rural life are popular which they love to recite. Their speech is rough arid coarse, and the manner of addressing both men and women is the same. Intoxicants are widely in use. They are extremely weak of faith and highly superstitious, and believe in omens and auguries. Both male and female dresses are Hinduised. In the olden days, infanticide was prevalent, but now it has been given up. Highway robbery and pillage had been’ their traditional profession, but they have been reformed lately. They. however, are still notorious ifor cattle-ifting.’

Moral virtues 
All the same, the Meos are distinguished for some excellent moral qualities and their vices and weaknesses are in the nature of the evil ways and practices that become a part of the moral and social pattern of brave and adventurous races as a result of want of education, isolation from the civilized world and indifference towards religion. These were rampant even among the Arabs during the Age of Ignorance. Natural talents and capabilities had taken a wrong turn owing to the perversity of the environment. Chivalry had degenerated into banditry, man­liness had found expression in mutual warfare and bloodshed, sense of pride and self-respect, with no better purpose to serve, had sought fulfillment in the defense of imaginary standards of honor and renown, and high mindedness, for its display, had adopted the path of pomp and flourish on petty occasions in the family or clan. In brief, God-given gifts of mind and character were being put to unworthy use, otherwise there was no dearth of virtue and merit among the Meos,

Rugged simplicity, hardihood and firmness of purpose were the chief characteristics of the Mewatis in which they were far superior to the urban Muslim population. It was on account of these qualities that in spite of having drifted so far away from Islam, the floodtide of Apostasy could not submerge the territory of Mewat even in the darkest period of its history.

For centuries the Maos had been living within the shell of their ignorance keeping by themselves and isolated from the outside world. A parallel can scarcely he found in the Indian history of a community so large and living in such a close proximity to the central seat of power and yet remaining so obscure and isolated. An advantage of it, however, was that the energies of the Mewatis, on the whole, remained conserved, the soil remained virgin while the deplorable habits and customs and superstitious belief and practices were, so to speak, like the weeds and scrubs growing on an uncultivated land. The Meos, in the 20th Century, were very much like the Arabs in the Age of Perversion

Beginnings 
As we have seen, contact with the Mewatis was established during the lifetime of Maulana Mohammad lsmail. It was not a chance occurrence, but an act of destiny that Maulana Mohammad Ismail came to live in Basti Nizamuddin which was the gateway of Mewat, and much before the arrival of Maulana Mohammad Ilyas, seeds of loyalty and devotion of his. family had been sown on its soil.
When the followers of Maulana Mohammad Ismail and Maulana Mohammad came to know that their true successor, the son of Maulana Mohammad Ismail and the brother of Maulana Mohammad had come to live at Nizamuddin they, again, started coming to it and requested Maulana Mohammad Ilyas for a visit so that the old suppliants of his family had an opportunity to renew the ties of fealty and spiritual allegiance.


Real remedy 
Maulana Mohammad Ilyas felt that the only Way to the religious reform and correction of the Mewatis was promotion of religious knowledge and familiarization with the rules and principles of the Shariat.

Maulana Mohammad ismail, and, after him, Maulana Mohammad had adopted the same method. They used to keep the Mewati children with them and educate them in their Madrassa, and, then, send them back to Mewat to carry on the work of reform and guidance, and what little religious awareness was found there was owing to the efforts of these pioneers.

Maulana Mohammad Ilyas went a step ahead and decided to establish Maktabs and Madrassas in Mewat itself so that the influence of Faith could spread to a wider area and the pace of change was accelerated.

Stipulation 
The Maulana knew what was, commonly, meant by inviting a spirtua! mentor or his successor to their place by his disciples and admirers, and he was not willing to go to Mewat only to fulfill the formalities of attending the dinner given in his honor delivering a few sermons and giving good counsel. He wanted to make sure before undertaking the trip, that some real advance would be made, as a result of his visit, towards bringing the Meos closer to Islam and improving their moral condition, arid, during those days, the setting up of Maktabs and Madrassas in Mewat appeared to him to be the most effective step in that direction. H had, thus, made it clear that he would accept the invitation only on the condition that they promised to establish Maktabs in their territory.

For the Mewatis, however, no undertaking could be harder to give. They considered the establishment of Maktabs next to impossible for the simple reason that no one would be sending his children to them, and, thus, depriving himself of their contribution to the family income as daily wage-earners. The enthusiasm of those who came to invite quickly subsided as they heard of the stipulation. In desperation, however, a Mewati, finally, made the promise, leaving the rest to God

Establishment of Maktabs 
Maulana Mohammad Ilyas, accordingly, went to Mewat and demanded the fulfillment of the promise. After great persuasion, the beginning was made and the first Maktab was established.

The Maulana used to tell the Mawatis, “Give me the pupils, I will provide the money.” The Meos who were, mainly, farmers, could not easily reconcile themselves to the position that their children applied themselves to reading and writing and stopped working in the fields or looking after the cattle. It took a lot of tact and perseverance to bring them round to it.



Ten Maktabs were opened during that visit. Once the ice was broken, the progress was easy. Sometimes, several Maktabs were opened in a day till, within a few years, hundreds of such schools were functioning in Mewat.

The Maulana had not undertaken the service of Faith as a “national cause”, the burden of providing the funds for which fell wholly upon the nation or the community, but as a personal affair and felt no hesitation in spending all he had on it. He believed that a person should perform a religious task as his own and expend his time and money freely in its way.

Once a person presented a purse to him with the request that he used it, exclusively, for his own needs. The Maulana replied, “If we do not regard Allah’s work our own, how can we claim to be His bondmen ?“ With a sigh, he added, “Alas! We are not the just appreciators of the sacred Prophet. We do not know his true worth.”

This was the Maulana’s rule of life. First of all, he spent from his own pocket on the religious endeavor he had launched in Mewat, and, then, alone, would accept help from others.

Passing Away
Due to Maulana Mohammad Ilyas (RA)'s sincerity and hard work the work of Tableegh began to spread and Jamaats started to visit all parts of the sub-continent within his life time. Hazrat Maulana Syed Suleiman Nadwi (RA) remarks, " Hazrat Maulana Mohammad Ilyas (RA) with his simplicity and dedication to the correct principles of Dawat (invitation) quietly turned the Mewatees into sincere and pious Muslims over a twenty five years and made them the envy of even the Muslims belonging to traditional religious families.

His hard word bore fruit in his life and he raised thousands of dedicated Muslims who continued on the path of Dawat even after his passing away.

Finally the humble, physically weak and thin Maulana passed away in 1324 Hijra leaving behind not one or two but thousands to take up his cause and continue on the path of reformation.

Founder of Tableeghi Jamaat- Part 1


Founder of Tableeghi Jamaat (Maulana Ilyas)- Part 1

Early Days

On the outskirts of Delhi, near the tomb of Khwaja Nizamuddin, there lived, some seventy years ago, a godly person in the house on top of the red gate of the historical building called Chaunsath Khamba. His name was Maulana Mohammad Ismail.

Maulana Mohammad Ismail

The. ancestral home of Maulana Mohammad Ismail was in Jhanjhana in the district of Muzaffarnagar. But when, after the death of his (Ismail) first wife, he married again in the family of Mufti Ilahi Bakhsh Kandhlawi, who belonged to the same ancestry as him, he visited Kandhla frequently and it became a second home to him.

The family of Siddiqui Sheikhs of Jhanjhana and Kandhla had been known, for generations, for piety and learning, and was held in high esteem in the neighborhood. The lines of descent of Maulana Mohammad Ismail and Mufti Ilahi Bakhsh Become one, six generations upwards. with Molvi Mohammad Sharif. The lineage runs as follows: Maulana Mohammad Ismail, son of Ghulam Husain, son, of Hakim Karim Bakhsh, son of Hakim Ghulam Mohiuddin, son of Molvi Mohammad Sajid, son of Mofti Mohammed Faiz, son of Molvi Mohammad Sharif, son of Molvi Mohammad Ashraf, son of Sheikh Jamal Mohammad Shah, son of Sheikh Baban Shah, son of Sheikh Bahauddin Shah, son of Molvi Mohammad Sheikh, son of Sheikh Mohammad Fazil, son of Es Sheikh Qutub Shah.

Mufti Ilahi Bakhsh 

Mufti Ilahi Bakhsh was among the most outstanding pupils of Shah Abdul Aziz. Besides being a distinguished teacher, author and legist, he was, also a Unani physician of a high order, and possessed a thorough knowledge of both the rational and traditional sciences. He had a great command over Arabic, Persian and Urdu poetry as well, as is borne out by his commentary of Banat Su'ad in which he has translated every line of Hazrat K'ab into Arabic, Persian and Urdu verse. He left behind about 40 books in Arabic and Persian of which Shiyamul Habib and Mathnaawi Maulana Rum Ka Takmial are more famous.

Mufti Ilahi Bakhsh had taken ba'it at the hand of Shah Abdul Aziz. A glowing proof of his sincerity and selflessness was that though he was a renowned spiritual mentor himself, on the death of Shah Abdul Aziz, he felt no hesitation in taking ba'it at the hand of the latter's young deputy, Syed Ahmad Shaheed, who was about 28 years his junior in age, and in seeking guidance from him. Mufti Sahib was born in 1748, and died in 1831, at the age of 83 years. All his sons and grandsons were men of learning and position. Scholarship and religiousness have been the characteristics of this family Molvi Abul Hasan's Mathnawi, Gulzar-i-Ibrahim, which forms a part of his well-known work, Bahr-i- Haqiqat, is a poem of rare spiritual feeling. Till recently, it was very popular. His son,

Molvi Nurul Hasan, and all the four grandsons, Molvi Ziaul Hasan, Molvi Akbar, Molvi Sulaiman and Hakim Molvi Ibrahim, attained to fame as worthy representatives of their celebrated ancestors.

Maulana Muzaffar Husain 

Mufti Saheb's nephew, Maulana Muzaffar Husain, who was a most favorite pupil of Shah Is'haq and a deputy of Shah Mohammad Yaqub, and had, also, been favored with the company of Syed Ahmad Shaheed, was a very pious and godly person. He never touched anything that was of doubtful purity in the eyes of the Shariat. Incidents of his humility and prayer and fullness are still fresh in the memory of the people of the neighboring areas and serve as a reminder to the glorious days of the earliest decades of Islam.

The maternal grand-daughter of Maulana Muzaffar Husain was married to Maulana Mohammad Ismail. It was his second marriage which was solemnized on October 3 1868. Maulana Mohammad Ismail was the tutor of the children of Mirza Ilahi Bakhsh, who was related to Bahadur Shah Zafar the last of the Mughal Emperors. He lived, as we have seen. in the house on top of the red gate of Chaunsath Khamba. Close to it, was a small mosque with a tin shed in front which used to serve as the parlor of Mirza Ilahi Bakhsh, and, owing to it, it was called Bangle Wali Masjid.

The Maulana was spending his days in obscurity and even Mirza Ilahi Bakhsh had no idea of his high station till he had a personal experience of how the Maualna prayers were granted by God. Worship, Zikr (repeating the Names, praise and Attributes of the Lord), attending to the needs of the travelers and teaching the Quran giving instruction in the Faith were his sole occupation in life. He used to take down the load from the heads of the thirsty laborers who passed the way place it on the ground, draw water from the well and give it to them to drink, and, then, offer two Rak'ats of Salaat, expressing gratitude to the Lord that He had given him the opportunity to serve His bondsmen, though he did not deserve it. He had attained the state of Ihsan.

Once, as he requested Maulana Rasheed Ahmad Gangohi to teach him Sulook, the latter remarked, "You don't need it. You have already attained the objective that is to be reached through this method. It is like a person who has read the Quran saying that he should, also, read the elementary text book of Arabic because he had not begun with it".

The Maulana was very fond of the recitation of the Quran An old wish of his was that he went on grazing the goats and reciting the Quran. He was very particular about some member of his family keeping vigil in the night. His second son, Maulana Yahya, used to study till midnight, and, then the Maulana himself got up and Maulana Yahya went to bed, and for the last part of the night, he woke up his eldest son, Maulana Mohammad.

The Maulana never bore a grudge against anyone. His detachment with the world was so complete that it had made him attached to everybody. All the persons who came into contact with him were impressed by his piety, sincerity and selflessness. Leaders of the different warring groups of Delhi held him in the highest esteem, and put an equal trust in him, though they disliked each other so much that none of them was willing to offer Salaat behind the other.

The link with Mewat, too, was established in his lifetime. It is related that, once, he went out in the hope of finding a Muslim whom he could bring to the mosque and offer Salaat with him On meeting some Muslim laborers, he inquired from them where they were going.? "We are going in search of work", they replied. "How much do you expect to earn?' asked the Maulana. The laborers, thereupon, told him about the daily wages they, generally, received. "If you get the same here," the Maulana asked, "What is the use of going elsewhere " The laborers agreed and the Maulana took them to the mosque and began to teach the Salaat and the Quran. He would pay them their wages every day and keep them engaged in their lessons. In a few days, they developed the habit of offering up Salaat. Such was the beginning of the Madrassa of Bangle Wali Masjid, and these laborers were its first scholars. After it, about ten Mewati students always remained in the Madrassa and their meals used to come from the house of Mirza Ilahi Bakhsh.

Death of Maulana Mohammad Ismail 

Maulana Mohammad Ismail died on :26th February, 1898 in Khajoor Wali Masjid at the Tiraha of Bahram in Delhi. The number of mourners, at his funeral, was so large that though long bamboo poles had been tied to the either side of the bier to enable them to lend a shoulder to it, many people did not get a chance during the entire route of three- and-a-half miles from Delhi to Nizamuddin.

Muslims belonging to various sects and schools of thought, who never got together, joined the procession. The Maulana's second son, Maulana Mohammad Yahya, narrates that my elder brother, Maulana Mohammad, was a very soft-hearted person and had a most obliging nature. Fearing that he might invite someone to lead the funeral service behind whom people of another sect or group refused to offer the prayer, and, thus an unpleasant situation arose, I stepped forward and said that I would lead the service. Everyone then, offered the prayers peacefully and there was no dissent or commotion.

Owing to the vast concourse of men, the funeral service had to be held a number of times and the burial was delayed. During it, a venerable person and another man known for his spirituality had a vision that Maulana Mohammad Ismail was saying, "Send me off soon. I am feeling ashamed The Holy Prophet is waiting for me

The Maulana had three sons: Maulana Mohammad from the first wife, and Maulana Mohammad Yahya and Maulana Mohammad Ilyas from the second, who was the maternal granddaughter of Maulana Muzaffar Husain The Maulana had married her after the death of his first wife.

Maulana Mohammed Ilyas 
Maulana Mohammed Ilyas was born in 1885 His childhood was spent in maternal grandfather's home in Kandhla, and with his father at Nizamuddin. In those days, the Kandhla family was the cradle of godliness and piety so much so that reports of the high religiosity nightly devotions and Zikr and Tilawat of its members, both male and female, would seem imaginary and fictitious to the faint-hearted men of our time

The ladies used to recite the Quran themselves in the Nafl prayers as well listen to its Tarawih and other Nafl prayers. standing behind the male relatives The month of Ramadan, in particular, was the springtime for the Quran. It was read for long hours, almost in every home The limit of absorption was that, sometimes, the ladies forgot to pay attention to purdah and would not become aware of the coming of outsiders in the house at a time of urgent need.



The Quran with its translation and commentary in Urdu, and Mazaahir-i-Haq Mashariq ul Anwaar and His-i-Haseen formed the limit of the education of the ladies. Deeds and accomplishments of the families of Syed Ahmad Shaheed and Shah Abdul Aziz were the most popular themes of conversation, and facts regarding these illustrious men of God were on everybody's lips. Instead of the stories of kings and fairies, ladies of the household related these to the children.



Ammi Bi Maulana Ilyas's maternal grandmother 

The Maulana's maternal grandmother, Amtus Salam, who was the daughter of Maulana Muzaffar Husain and was known in the family as Ammi Bi, was a very pious lady. About her Salaat, the Maulana, once observed "I saw her likeness of Ammi Bi's Salaat of Maulana Gangohi"

During the last phase of her life, Ammi Bi's state was that she never asked for food and ate only when someone placed before her. It was a large family and there was always so much to do. If the thought of having her meal! did not occur to her in the midst of domestic chores, she simply went hungry. Once, someone said to her, "You are so old and weak. How do you manage to without food ?" "I draw sustenance from my Tasbihat (remembrance of Allah) was her repy"


Bi Safia, Maulana Ilyas's mother
The mother of Maulana Mohammad Ilyas, Bi Safia, had learnt the Quran by heart and attained great distinction in it. It was a regular practice with her to recite the whole of the Quran and additional ten Juze (part) every day during Ramadan. She, thus, completed forty recitals of the Quran in that month and was so fluent in it that her household duties did not suffer on account of it. See, generally, kept herself engaged in some work while doing the recitation. Apart from the month of Ramadan, her daily routine of worship included: DURUD Sharif, 5,000 times; Ism-i-Zaat Allah, 5,000 times; Bismillah ar-Rahman ar-Rahim, 1,000 times, Yaa Mughnee-u 1,100 times, La illaaha illallaah, 1,200 times Yaa-Haiyyu, Ya Qaiyum 200 times, Hasbiallaah wa ni'mul Vakil, 500 times; Subhan Allah, 200 times; Alhamdu lillaah, 200 times; La ilaaha illallaah, 200 times; Allah O-Akbar, 200 times; Istighfar, 500 times; Ofwwizu amree illallaah, 100 times; Hasbunallaah wa ni'mul Vakil, 1000 times; Rabb-i in-ni maghloobun fantasir, 1,000 times: Rabb-i-inni masanni-az-zurru wa anla ar-hamur rahimeen, 100 times; Laa ilaaha enta subhanaka in-ni kunzu minaz-zalimeen, 100 times. In addition, she recited a Manzil (1/7) of the Quran everyday.

Like all other children in the family, the Maulana Ilyas began his education in the maktab, and, according to the family tradition, learnt the Quran by heart. The learning of the Quran was so common in the family. that in the one-and-a-half row of worshippers in the family mosque, there was not a single non Hafiz except the Muezzin. Maulana Mohammad Ilyas was Ammi Bi's favorite child. She used to say; to him. "Ilyas, I feel the aroma of the holy Companions in you. " Sometimes, placing her hand on his back, she would say, "How is it that I see figures resembling the holy Companions moving along with you?



From his childhood, there was present in Maulana Mohammad Ilyas a touch of the religious ardour and fervent feeling of the blessed Companions which had led Shaikhul Hind Maulana Mahmood Hasan to remark that "when I see Mohammad Ilyas, I am reminded of the holy Companions. Eagerness and enthusiasm for Faith were ingrained in his nature. Even in his early days, he, sometimes, did things which were much above the common level of the children. Riazul Islam Kandhlawi, a class fellow of his in .he Maktab, says that "when we were reading in the Maktab, he, Maulana Mohammad Ilyas, once, came with a stick and said, "Comes Riazul Islam, let us do Jihaad against those who do not offer up Salaat



Stay at Gangoh 
In 1893, his elder brother, Mohammad Yahya, went to live at Gangoh with Maulana Rasheed Ahmad Gangohi. Maulana Mohammad Ilyas used to live with his father at Nizamuddin, and, sometimes, with his maternal grand-father's family at Kandhla. At Nizamuddin, his education was being neglected owing to the over- fondness of his father and his own excessive occupation with prayers. Maulana Yahya, thus, requested his father that as the education of Mohammad Ilyas was suffering, he might be allowed to take him to Gangoh. The father agreed - and Maulana Mohammad Ilyas came to Gangoh in 1896 or early 1897 where Mohammad Yahya began to teach him regularly.

Gangoh, in those days, was the seat of Sufi-saints and savants, the benefit of whose company was constantly available to Maulana Mohammad Ilyas. A greater part of his impression able age was spent there. When he went to live at Gangoh, he was 10 or 11 years old, and at the time of Maulana Rasheed Ahmed Gangohi death, in 1905, he was a young man of about 20. Thus, he stayed with Maulana Gangohi for about 9 years.

Maulana Mohammad Yahya was an ideal teacher and benefactor. He wanted his brother to derive the utmost advantage from the society of those illustrious men. Maulana Mohammad Ilyas used to tell that when the Ulema who had been the favorite pupils or disciples of Maulana Gangohi came to Gangoh, his brother would, often, stop the lessons and say that his education, then, lay in sitting with them and listening to their conversation.

Usually, Maulana Gangohi did not take bait from children and students. It was only when they had completed their education that he allowed them to take the pledge. But owing to the exceptional merit of Maulana Mohammad Ilyas, he, at his request, permitted him to do the bait at his hand.

Maulana Mohammad Ilyas had been born with a loving heart. Such a strong attachment did he develop for Maulana Gangohi that he felt no peace without him. He would, often, get up in the night, go and see the Maulana's face, and return to his bed. Maulana Gangohi, too, had a great affection for him. once, Maulana Mohammad Ilyas told his brother of severe headache after which he could not bend his head even to the extent of performing the Sajdah on a pillow for months. Maulana Gangohi son, Hakim Masud Ahmad, who was his physician, had a peculiar method of treatment. In certain diseases, he forbade the use of water for a long time which was :unbearable to most of the patients. But with the strength of mind that was so characteristic of him, Maulana Mohammad Ilyas abided strictly by the advice of his physician and abstained from drinking water for full seven years, and, during the next five years, he drank it only sparingly.

There was little hope that he would be to resume his education after the discontinuation owing to illness. He was very keen to take it up again, but his well-wishers would not allow. One day, as Maulana Mohammad Yahya said to him what he would, in any case, do by studying, he retorted, "What will I do by living?" Ultimately, he succeeded in resuming his studies.

The death of Maulana Gangohi occurred in 1905. Maulana Mohammed Ilyas who was at his bedside during the dying moments and reciting the Sura of Ya-Sin, was so deeply affected by it that he used, often, to say, "Two shocks have been most painful to me. One was of the death of my father, and the other, of the death of Maulana Rasheed Ahmad Gangohi. " In 1908, Maulana Mohammad Ilyas went to Deoband where he studied Tirmizi and Sahih Bukhari from Maulana Mahmood Hasan. The latter advised him to approach Maulana Khalil Ahmad Saharanpuri for spiritual guidance and instruction, since his mentor, Maulana Rasheed Ahmad Gangohi, was no more, and, thus, he completed the various stages of Sulook under Maulana Saharanpuri's supervision.

Absorption in prayers 

During his stay at Gangoh, after the death of Maulana Gangohi, Maulana Mohammad Ilyas, generally, remained silent and spent most of his time in meditation. Says Maulana Mohammad Zakaria, "We read elementary Persian from him those days. His practice, then, was that he sat cross legged, and in utter silence, on a coarse mat behind the tomb of Shah Abdul Quddus. We presented ourselves for the lesson, opened the book, and placed it before him, indicating with the finger where we were to begin from on that day. We would read aloud and translate the Persian verses. When we made a mistake, he would shut the book with a movement of the finger, and the lesson came to an end. It meant that we were to go back, prepare the lesson thoroughly, and, then, come again . . . ................. He used to offer Nafl prayers much and often at that time. From Maghrib till a little before Isha, he devoted himself exclusively to Nawafil. His age, then, was between 20 and 25 years.